“Foundations will do a better job with lower administrative costs and better selection of beneficiaries than the government.” Warren Buffett

From an Arthur Laffer commentary in the January 11, 2012 Wall Street Journal:

Incidentally, I’m not the first to question Mr. Buffett’s commitment to “shared sacrifice” in balancing the federal budget. In a 2007 CNBC interview, when asked why he shelters his money through tax-free strategies rather than writing big checks to Uncle Sam, Mr. Buffett responded: “I think that on balance the Gates Foundation, my daughter’s foundation, my two sons’ foundations will do a better job with lower administrative costs and better selection of beneficiaries than the government.”

Amen, Mr. Buffet, I agree. I think my (and many others) modest monthly contributions to the Link Community School in Newark, NJ does a better job helping inner city minority children get a good education and better chance at the American dream than any government program. Such a program is a combination of the efforts of families who care, children who are motivated, dedicated educators and private contributors who care about effective use of their money .

That’s a lot different from government grants thrown at bureaucrats down the line who are largely unaccountable except perhaps to the politicians who want to be seen as caring for the downtrodden.

Mr. Buffet and the super wealthy like him on the left of our society must find it easy to promote higher taxes when no amount of taxation will impact them. However, it is mind-boggling that these really smart, savvy people think filtering more and more of American’s income through a massive, politically motivated, inefficient government bureaucracy is the most efficient or fairest way to raise the quality of life for us all. “War on poverty you say.”