2014
Ok, I said it. I didn’t say it was the best system or that it will control costs, but it’s coming in any case and here are the main reasons.
⬛️ Obamacare will not control costs and the pressure will build for something new
⬛️ Physicians are being squeezed on their fees, by insurance companies, by regulations and by Medicare. Many are ready to give up private practice. According to the American Medical Association, about 60 percent of family doctors and pediatricians, 50 percent of surgeons and 25 percent of surgical subspecialists are employees rather than independent, and the number is growing. Once the majority of physicians are salaried, opposition to a single-payer system evaporates.
⬛️ Two fundamental problems of our system are the lack of coordination of patient care and the financial incentives to provide more care. It’s hard to see how the current fractured delivery system can address those issues
⬛️ Americans don’t want to deal with health care costs directly and they don’t accept the rationale behind premiums. It’s like retirement. Americans don’t think much about Social Security and Medicare taxes, but they do a poor job of thinking about and putting their own money away for retirement
✔️ Now consider this back of the envelope estimate. Total non-government health care spending (everything except Medicare, Medicaid, CHIPs) is estimated to be $1,141 trillion in 2016. Using the estimated payroll base for Medicare taxes of $7,093,103,448,275 a payroll tax of about 16% would cover health care spending. Assume an employee share of 8% (remember, Obamacare considers 9.5% of household income affordable). I’m thinking many people would consider that a good deal to have what would amount to an under 65 Medicare like program. As far as employers go, 8% is not much more than they are paying now.
From an Employee Benefit Research Institute publication
⬛️ Whether it is premiums and out-of-pocket costs in a Obamacare exchange plan, employer plan or private coverage, these costs are creating a significant financial burden for all but the lowest income Americans. This is not sustainable
⬛️ Employers have had it with health care benefits. The value of benefits they do provide is shrinking rapidly and an increasing number are shifting most of the responsibility to private exchanges. I’m guessing many employers would welcome a new payroll tax that gets them 100% out of the business.
Don’t get me wrong, universal health care is no panacea. Costs will still go up, some forms of rationing, at least by American standards, will be necessary and then there is the bureaucracy. But you see, at some point the frustration level with our current system will make all that irrelevant.
So when will all this occur? Your guess is as good as mine, but within ten years discussions will get serious.


8% of the federal minimum wage would be about $100 a month – assuming 52 weeks a year, 40 hours a day, $7.25 per hour.
8% of my income would be considerably more … think I’ll just stop working and really retire, creating a business, not a job, subject to capital gains taxes, not FICA-MED (or whatever you end up calling it).
People will respond, adjust, and just like PPACA, all the projections will be wrong.
What follows single payor when it fails? I think we know the answer to that question – looks like public coverae with a private, supplemental plan…. Where have we seen that before (look at Great Britain, our own Medicare, most any place in the world where there is socialized medicine).
Have a nice day.
LikeLike
A universal single-payer system health system is not inevitable. Here are the main reasons:
1. After it collapses in three to four years, the Affordable Care Act will serve as an inoculation against further government intrusion into the health payment system.
2. Americans are among the most impatient creatures in the universe. What is inevitable with single payer systems are long waits to see the doctor, up with which Americans will not put.
3. Health care costs will rise as the baby boomers enter their inevitable, there’s that word again, decline and death. It may surprise many when cranky boomer patients start demanding coordinated care.
4. Younger, healthier Americans will reach the end of their tolerance for subsidizing the pampered boomers. They want basic catastrophic coverage first and foremost.
LikeLike
Let me offer an alternate narrative
4. Younger, healthier Americans will reach the end of their tolerance for subsidizing the pampered boomers. Since the vehicle of the pampering is Medicare, the younger healthier Americans will demand greater and greater cuts to it which means higher and higher out of pocket costs to Medicare beneficiaries.
3. Health care costs will rise as the baby boomers enter their inevitable, there’s that word again, decline and death. It may surprise many when cranky boomer patients start demanding coordinated care. Cranky or not, the out of pocket costs will become quite onerous and many just won’t have the financial resources to deal with it. (see item 4)
2. Americans are among the most impatient creatures in the universe. What is inevitable with single payer systems are long waits to see the doctor. Very true, but impatience won’t pay the bill.
1. After it collapses in three to four years, the Affordable Care Act will serve as an inoculation against further government intrusion into the health payment system. Ah, if only that were true but to have government intrusion stop we would be talking about repealing Medicare A,B,C & D plus Medicaid and any laws that require hospitals to treat people whether or not they have the ability to pay.
I think Mr. Quinn is right. As I mentioned on this blog once before; this train is heading for universal healthcare. Obamacare is just a stop along the way.
LikeLike
Yeah, I’m going with Vince on this one, because of point #1: Obamacare is unpopular now, and the worst is yet to come. I see nothing in the political cards that would make me believe that single payer, which is not at all politically possible now, will somehow become MORE possible when the Obamacare finances go into the toilet.
Look at how the finances for Romneycare completely fell off the rails and Mass. finally had to dump it and impose price controls. Not a blueprint for the future.
The other point I’d like to make is that Dick ends his entry by noting he talking about 10 years or more in the future. No one, Dick, me or anyone else, has a clue what things are going to look like 10 or more years out.
We already have single payer for the poor. I suspect extending Medicaid to all the Obamacare Exchange victims is about as close as we’ll get.
LikeLike