We can’t control what others do and we can’t stop misfortune from striking. But we can control our own actions. Those who are financially prudent will most likely enjoy success, even if events don’t always go their way.
More laws, more plans, more complication, more spending – unnecessary!
The last thing we need is more complication added to our national retirement non-system and we don’t need more federal spending before we get our financial house in order. We need simplification. This legislation is expected to be reintroduced this year or next.
Strengthen the foundation of retirement income, strengthen Social Security for everyone. Don’t divert taxpayer money to personal retirement savings.
There are no gaps in the system, there are plenty of opportunities to save unrelated to employment even for low and moderate income. It takes individual responsibility. That is what’s missing.
Such legislation will discourage employer plans and lower the need for employer matching contributions given the taxpayer funded contribution and tax credits.
The ‘Retirement Savings for Americans Act’ would address significant and longstanding gaps in the U.S. retirement system that have severely limited participation from low- and moderate-income workers,” said EIG President and CEO John Lettieri. “If enacted, this
legislation would result in a healthier retirement system, a more financially secure workforce, and a stronger economy to the benefit of all Americans.”
Key features
The “Retirement Savings for Americans Act” contains the following provisions:
Eligibility and Auto Enrollment: Full- and part-time workers who lack access to an employer-sponsored retirement plan would be eligible for an account, and they would be automatically enrolled at 3% of their income. They could choose to increase or decrease their withholding, or opt out entirely at any time. Independent workers (including gig workers) would also be eligible.
Federal Contribution: Low- and moderate-income workers would be eligible for a 1% automatic contribution (as long as they remain employed) and up to a 4% matching contribution via a refundable federal tax credit. This would begin to phase out at median income.
Portability: Accounts would remain attached to workers throughout their lifetimes, and workers would be able to stop and start contributions at will.
Private Assets: The accounts would be the property of the worker and the assets could be passed down to future generations to help them build wealth and financial security.
Investment Options: Much like the current Thrift Savings Plan, participants would be given a menu of simple, low-fee investment options to choose from, including lifecycle funds tied to a worker’s estimated retirement date, or index funds made of stocks and bonds.
May be pay as you go. Today’s workers pay today’s retirees. Isn’t the “Trust Fund” kind of imaginary money anyway? We borrowed it from ourselves and pay it back to ourselves, with interest
Check out the Galveston Plan–since inception it has gone through all forms of havoc like 2000, 2008, 2019, 2022. Proved to be a pretty solid situation for those participants.
Get the Feds involved and we get; “if you like your doctor you can keep you doctor”–“will cost at most $2,500”. Politico in 2011 I believe called it the lie of the decade. Was it the MIT guy working with Obama and the rest who was quoted as saying most people aren’t too bright and would fall for that baloney. How correct he was!
I can only imagine what we will hear from those who want a national health care system or Medicare on steroids.
May be pay as you go. Today’s workers pay today’s retirees. Isn’t the “Trust Fund” kind of imaginary money anyway? We borrowed it from ourselves and pay it back to ourselves, with interest
LikeLike
Yep, another proposal to add another piece to the crazy quilt we have now. There has to be a reason someone wants this scheme thrown into the mix.
LikeLike
The big investment firms and mutual funds like the idea
LikeLike
Sounds like just another form of Social Security to me.
LikeLike
Not hardly
LikeLike
Check out the Galveston Plan–since inception it has gone through all forms of havoc like 2000, 2008, 2019, 2022. Proved to be a pretty solid situation for those participants.
Get the Feds involved and we get; “if you like your doctor you can keep you doctor”–“will cost at most $2,500”. Politico in 2011 I believe called it the lie of the decade. Was it the MIT guy working with Obama and the rest who was quoted as saying most people aren’t too bright and would fall for that baloney. How correct he was!
I can only imagine what we will hear from those who want a national health care system or Medicare on steroids.
LikeLike