We can’t control what others do and we can’t stop misfortune from striking. But we can control our own actions. Those who are financially prudent will most likely enjoy success, even if events don’t always go their way.
Have to agree with Al, all that junk created jobs.
Then I have to agree with Jerry Brown, we don’t need jobs. We need things. Like food, housing, clothes, medical care, etc. And, we need more welfare, not less. Why are we forcing people to find jobs to produce “all that junk” that we don’t need?
Now, two incomes are almost a necessity*, to build and fill those walk in closets. In the good old days that many of us recall, most wives were out of the paid workforce. Were we better off? We were less wasteful, for the most part. And by wasteful, I mean natural resources, materials, energy, etc., that our children may regret in the future.
If people are un/underemployed, why not increase welfare to allow them to survive (comfortably)? Instead of forcing them to waste resources to find a job producing “all that junk”.
My sister and her husband, over the years made millions (a few, not mega) by NOT planting crops on some of their land. Why not pay more people enough to stay home and not waste resources filling up closets?
My car is in my garage (HOA rules) and we don’t have a walk in. We just downsized and took truckloads to the dump, and more truckloads to Salvation Army. Then I gave the truck to my grandson.
all that junk created jobs for folks–we would bemoan unemployed folks if we did just the basics–my house, built 1932, has no walk in closet or bathroom in the bedroom–walk down the hall–works for me but not my wife.
A good part of the problem is people are reluctant to get rid of stuff they don’t wear anymore or other stuff that goes unused year after year. I’m guilty of that myself so I know it takes space to keep it around. I always intend to use it but never get around to it.
Have to agree with Al, all that junk created jobs.
Then I have to agree with Jerry Brown, we don’t need jobs. We need things. Like food, housing, clothes, medical care, etc. And, we need more welfare, not less. Why are we forcing people to find jobs to produce “all that junk” that we don’t need?
Now, two incomes are almost a necessity*, to build and fill those walk in closets. In the good old days that many of us recall, most wives were out of the paid workforce. Were we better off? We were less wasteful, for the most part. And by wasteful, I mean natural resources, materials, energy, etc., that our children may regret in the future.
If people are un/underemployed, why not increase welfare to allow them to survive (comfortably)? Instead of forcing them to waste resources to find a job producing “all that junk”.
My sister and her husband, over the years made millions (a few, not mega) by NOT planting crops on some of their land. Why not pay more people enough to stay home and not waste resources filling up closets?
My car is in my garage (HOA rules) and we don’t have a walk in. We just downsized and took truckloads to the dump, and more truckloads to Salvation Army. Then I gave the truck to my grandson.
*for us average income folks.
LikeLike
all that junk created jobs for folks–we would bemoan unemployed folks if we did just the basics–my house, built 1932, has no walk in closet or bathroom in the bedroom–walk down the hall–works for me but not my wife.
LikeLike
A good part of the problem is people are reluctant to get rid of stuff they don’t wear anymore or other stuff that goes unused year after year. I’m guilty of that myself so I know it takes space to keep it around. I always intend to use it but never get around to it.
LikeLike
404 Error – page not found
same result trying the link here and in the email
LikeLike
Fixed
LikeLike
The link doesn’t work.
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
LikeLike
Fixed
LikeLike
Dick – link did not work
LikeLike