Bashing the 401k scam – looking for a better idea

Go to main Forum page »

AUTHOR: R Quinn on 11/26/2024

I recently read – again – that 401k plans are a scam. You can’t save enough, you can lose money, etc.

Consider these words of wisdom. “It is a scam. When I worked in corporate America I contributed the max amount each year. At the time it was $19k per year. It took 5+ years to hit $100k. When I stopped contributing it barely grew.”

We don’t know the years involved, but nevertheless it’s nonsense. Investing the $19,000 a year even in a GIC would get you over $100,000 in less than five years. 

It’s a long term investment folks! Not to be borrowed from or used for hardship expenses. Think of it as a lockbox for your future security.

That’s not how many, I dare say most, participants view the 401k. 

Somehow we have been convinced the 401k is a poor replacement for the pension which was never universal, was designed to hold workers to a job for decades and was dependent on the financial state of the employer – think Studebaker – defunct in 1968 after being in business since 1852 and leaving retirees high and dry with no funded pensions – helping to precipitate ERISA which in itself unintentionally accelerated the demise of many pension plans. 

[Note for history buffs, Studebaker made most of the wagons for the migration West and made the carriage taking Lincoln to the theater] my Dad sold Studebaker and Packard. I learned to drive on a Studebaker Lark and even drove an Avanti – once the fastest production car in the world at the time – 170 mph. 

Although I enjoy a good pension – plan was started in 1911 –  and would not trade it, linking your financial fate to the fortunes of one employer or even union has its risks. Unfortunately, the transfer of risk to the worker via 401k has not gone well either with too many workers taking only a month to month view of investments or poorly allocating funds. 

Outside IRS rules, there is a lack of uniformity in 401k plan design and certainly regarding employer contributions and investment options. They are clearly underused, misused and not fully understood by workers, but they are not a scam

They can provide a valuable component of financial security. I first contributed to our 401k when I implemented it in1982 at the urging of the Board of Directors. It seemed to be the thing  to do even with a pension plan. I always contributed something until the day I retired in Jan 2010, at times just enough to get the company match. Today after nearly 15 years retired and ten RMDs closely links to 4%, my balance has grown considerable and easily exceeds the balance on December 31, 2009. 

The US needs a better universal retirement system, more user friendly, more uniform, guaranteed employer participation, but that’s something for the next generation to solve. 

For now, we better focus on making Social Security sustainable. 

Join the discussion on HumbleDollar

One comment

  1. Question: Is there an advantage to using 401k not for retirement per se, but strictly as a tax saving investment program? I assumed* so years ago, because it allowed me to invest more, and take advantage of the compounding interest. Mine was a 457 (no employer match), as I have a decent pension. Since retirement, I have been reinvesting the RMDs and the whole kit and kaboodle is “for the kids”.

    *You know what they say…

    Like

Leave a Reply