Tariffs are a type of tax imposed by a government on imported goods. While the importer is the one who legally pays the tax to the government’s customs authority, the economic burden of tariffs is often distributed more broadly among importers, foreign exporters, and domestic consumers.
Nobody is a net winner. There is always an economic burden. Sooner or later importers and exporters, some domestic producers will reach their limit on absorbing the extra cost.
Reduced profits anywhere along the supply chain can affect middle class American investors – including those saving for retirement.
Here is a breakdown of how tariffs affect different parties:
Importers: These are the domestic businesses that purchase goods from foreign countries. They are legally responsible for paying the tariff to their government. To manage this increased cost, they may try to negotiate a lower price with their foreign suppliers.
Consumers: The cost of the tariff is often passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices for imported goods. This is especially true if there are few domestic alternatives or if the demand for the imported product is inelastic. That is the case for clothes and shoes in the U.S.

Foreign Exporters: Exporters in the foreign country may have to lower their prices to remain competitive in the market where the tariff has been imposed. This means they absorb some of the cost, which can lead to reduced profits.
Domestic Producers: Tariffs are often implemented to protect domestic industries by making imported goods more expensive. This can lead to increased demand for locally produced goods, but it can also raise the cost of production for domestic industries that rely on imported parts or materials.


But who is really benefiting from the tariffs? Trump said he wanted to increase manufacturing in the USA. Is this happening? What about the small businesses? Will they survive the tariffs? And of course the impact on our “former” allies, like Canada, will last longer than Trump. As other countries find other resources, will we be able to repair those trade connections? Will anyone trust the USA?
LikeLike
Tariffs are indeed mostly passed on to consumers; some businesses may temporarily absorb part of the increase, but no business can indefinitely absorb increased costs without eventually passing them on to consumers. Selling below cost and making it up on volume is part of our collective “Twilight Zone” mentality that we believe whatever fantasy President Trump tweets. Ah yes, we do live in interest times…
LikeLike
Al Lindquist:
remember that “Twilight Zone” has been around for decades–Trump is just the latest version–let’s not forget the checks sent out by Trump and Biden (2 times) at “no cost” to us and fostered a strong economy except they forgot about inflation–remember Pres. Ford and WIN (Whip Inflation Now)? how well did that work–Reagan cut taxes and brought in more money but it was spent–Clinton had the benefit of the “peace dividend” and Allen Greenspan as Fed honcho as well as being smart and pragmatic we had had surpluses–from 2000 on the “Twilight Zone” was back in force.
Trump is a manifestation of what preceded him but no excuses if this tariff business blows up in his face and ours also as we all suffer.
LikeLike
No, President Trump is not a manifestation of his US president predecessors; he is a failed real estate developer -with multiple bankruptcies- who ultimately found success as a reality TV star. His recent firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics for “bad numbers” is however a “manifestation” of a predecessor of sorts- Hugo Chavez, the former President of Venezuela, who fired and/ or jailed anyone who disagreed or opposed him in any way. That didn’t work out well for the Venezuela or it’s people.
LikeLike
Economically illiterate ^
LikeLike
There are many moving parts to the tariff question that have to be sorted out over time. It is not so simple that the same goods will come from the same country and be increased at the cost of the tariff. In some cases yes, in other areas no. If China has a larger tariff imposed then Vietnam can grab increased export business if they are subject to a lower tariff. That is one example among many. There is great uncertainty how this will all shake out worldwide in the long run.
What we know for now is that taxes have increased at the border and you have long complained about the tax cuts since 2017. So some of that is returning to the federal coffers.
LikeLike
What people don’t know apparently is it is not free money and they are paying in some way. In some cases, it may be paid with jobs. I can’t find one economist outside the political world who thinks all this is a good idea, nationally or globally.
At best, these new taxes will offset some the increased deficits caused by the OBBA, but a net gain for Americans and the world is questionable and I don’t think well thought out. Trumps idea of a good negotiation is always being the winner. That is not in our best interests over time.
LikeLike
Al Lindquist
what is beneficial is the economic literacy now shown by the lefties who have touted higher taxes for as long as I can remember–a tariff, in my opinion, is a tax, and a tax paid by business and consumers–
like any other tax it, as you show, filters down to all of us in one form or another–raise gas taxes and guess who pays–raise income taxes and 50% of us pay directly and the bottom half pay more for goods and services and maybe lose jobs, thus an indirect effect–where is the “sweet spot’? I have no idea–if we spend less then we need less.
it really is common sense as shown by so many blue states losing folks to lower tax and regulation red states–it pays to notice when folks vote with their feet and ask what could be the reasons–maybe climate–maybe taxes–crime–schools–congestion–wacky politics–so far I get taxes and quality of life when they ask that question.
LikeLike