According to multiple news sources (including Reuters and others citing anonymous sources familiar with the event):
“ I can do whatever I want.” DJT press conference 2-20-26
During a White House meeting/breakfast with U.S. governors, Trump was informed of the (SCOTUS tariff) ruling.
He called it a “disgrace.”
He visibly appeared frustrated and stated that he “had to do something about the courts” (or “he had to do something about the courts,” per direct reporting).
This came amid broader tensions in 2026 between the Trump administration and the judiciary, with ongoing criticisms from Trump and allies (like JD Vance) about courts blocking or limiting executive actions on issues like tariffs, deportations, and more. The tariff ruling was a significant setback for his economic agenda, which he had framed as essential to national security and prosperity.
What does “do something about the courts“ mean?
When it comes to Trump, who knows, but one thing is clear, other than propose appointment to certain courts, there is nothing the President can or should do about our courts – other than abide by court rulings and the law.
Feb. 20, 2026, 1:29 p.m. ET16 minutes ago
Zolan Kanno-Youngs White House reporter NYTs
Trump’s comment about being “ashamed” of the Supreme Court justices he has described as “our people” is indicative of his expectation of loyalty from officials in traditionally independent institutions, whether it be the Justice Department or in this case, the Supreme Court.
Not just traditionally independent‼️ That’s what the Constitution demands.
The most significant power of the Supreme Court is judicial review. This is the authority to declare legislative acts (laws passed by Congress) or executive actions (orders from the President) unconstitutional.
- Establishing the Power: This role wasn’t explicitly detailed in the Constitution but was established in the landmark 1803 case, Marbury v. Madison.
- The “Final Word”: Once the Court declares a law unconstitutional, that law is essentially voided. Only a future Supreme Court decision or a Constitutional Amendment can change that outcome
The U.S. Constitution establishes the federal government with three distinct branches—legislative, executive, and judicial—through a system of separation of powers. This structure prevents any one branch from becoming too powerful and includes checks and balances among them.
The Constitution does not use the exact phrase “separation of powers” or “branches of government,” but it clearly divides authority by vesting specific powers in each branch via the Vesting Clauses in Articles I, II, and III.
Executive Branch (Enforces the Laws)
• Article II, Section 1: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”
• The President enforces laws, commands the military, makes treaties (with Senate approval), appoints officials (with Senate consent), and handles foreign affairs.
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
QUINNSCOMMENTARY 