Remember when the Affordable Care Act was not only fully funded, but reduced the deficit? Obama 2013 budget asks $1.5 billion more for implementation.

2013

It seems there is never enough money no matter what. It seems politicians and bureaucrats always underestimate costs or make unrealistic assumptions. Here is a perfect example. Wouldn’t you think the costs of implementation would be better estimated and accounted for, especially related to the centerpiece of the Affordable Care Act?

From Kaiser Health News:

Obama’s budget for the year beginning Oct. 1 seeks $1.5 billion to run exchanges in the 26 states that have refused so far to set up their own exchange, as well as the seven states that are partnering with the federal government to run an exchange.

The budget also assumes that the administration will collect $450 million in user fees, such as those levied on health plans that participate in the federal exchanges. The budget request and anticipated user fees will amount to about $2 billion for the federal exchanges.

According to HHS, since 2011, 37 states and the District of Columbia received more than $3.4 billion in grants to operate exchanges. Obama’s budget request calls for an additional $2 billion in state grants in fiscal 2014.

The law provided generous subsidies to states that set up exchanges and it was widely assumed most states would do that. But when so many opted instead to let the federal government establish the marketplace, many advocacy groups expressed concern that the law did not provide adequate resources.

Earlier this year, federal officials asked Congress for $949 million to help fund the exchanges but the request was not included in the continuing resolution that funds the government through Sept. 30. Sebelius said the request for additional exchange funding is part of “an ongoing conversation with Congress.”

“As this act is fully implemented and Americans begin to take advantage of the benefits, I’m hopeful that Congress will see that this is the law of the land,” Sebelius said at a briefing on the budget. “The Supreme Court has ruled, there has been an election. We intend to implement the law and millions and millions of Americans are looking forward to the full implementation.”

At the briefing, Ellen Murray, HHS assistant secretary for financial resources, said despite not getting additional funds, the administration expects to spend $1.5 billion in the current fiscal year to fund creation of the federal exchanges. That money comes from several sources, including $235 million from the health law’s implementation fund, $116 million using Sebelius’ limited authority to transfer money between accounts and $450 million from a “nonrecurring expenses fund” that allows federal agencies to use dollars from prior years for one time information technology and real estate investments. </blockquote>

One comment

  1. $1.5 billion to implement the ACA, versus $20 billion for Air Conditioning in a needless war in Iraq. Or $720 million for late fees on containers. You’re happy for the US to spend 45% of the entire worlds military budget, to protect 5% of the worlds population.

    Like

Leave a Reply