Here is a report from the Center for Responsive Politics. The point is that unrestricted political contributions contribute to inequality and undue influence by a few Americans.
Is this a problem? In some ways yes, but inequality?😳 If we curtail this spending, do we solve the real problem or simply scale back the payoffs? Is the average voter so clueless they are influenced by the misleading attack and other ads paid for with all this cash? I’ll leave you to answer that😜
Forget the money coming in, who is the guy or woman who allows it to influence them and the laws they support? You know the answer, it is the person you voted for and then re-elected and re-elected and re-elected and re-elected and re-elected and re-elected so that they have more influence to sell.
This is what is not good news!
The fact is the American voter is the real problem and also the fact we don’t have term limits. Do you seriously think money in politics wasn’t a problem before the SCOTUS opened the spigot for individuals, corporations and unions?
|






For the past four decades voters have returned incumbents to Congress 90% of the time. If a newcomer to politics tries to oust an incumbent, she has a very steep hill to climb. If that newcomer has lots of money, that hill becomes a little less steep. If the newcomer has little money, she’ll be another name in the long list of losers to the power of incumbency.
LikeLike