Christmas will never be the same for Noah’s grandpa

About the time that maniac was at the Sandy Hook Elementary School I was having lunch with two of my grandsons, both age four. When I heard the news I thought of two other grandchildren seven and five at their school. I haven’t been able to stop thinking about my grandchildren or the twenty children in that school in Connecticut since. When I heard that one of the children killed was only six I cried. Tears come easy every time I read or hear an updated news report. It is impossible to truly empathize with the parents, it is incomprehensible.

In a few weeks, this event will fade from our memories, just as have the other massacres that have occurred in the last year which you have no doubt forgotten; we move on. The parents of those twenty children will never forget, life and Christmas will never be the same … ever. Even though I am a distant observer like most Americans, I too will never get over this horror.

Through rationalization we have come to hear all too often, “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” Enough, if guns were not so easily in the hands of people, the disturbed among us would not so easily be able to do what they do. What was this killers mother doing with multiple weapons? Oh I know, protection, because the constitution says she has a right to bear arms or she just liked to shoot guns at targets.

While I don’t get it, I can accept hunters owning the equipment they need to pursue their “sport.” Of course, if it were a true sport they would be using spears and bow and arrow, but I guess the challenge of shooting an unaware animal from 300 yards is irresistible. I can even accept that some people feel the need for a handgun in their dresser drawer. Beyond that, beyond a basic firearm there is no need for a society to tolerate more. There is no need for high-powered automatic weapons, military weapons or anything close to it. There is no need for large caches of weapons or hundreds of rounds of ammunition in any home.

There is a need for background checks, for licenses, for detailed records of sales and transfers on a uniform national level. And yes, for limits on the type of firearms in the hands of citizens.

The right to keep and bear arms was born of a different time and for a different purpose by people who feared for their lives if they ventured ten miles from home, who hunted for survival and most of all who we’re just shedding the shackles of a monarchy and were uncertain of what was to come next. I find it incredulous that people can argue so vehemently the case to have guns on an unrestricted basis. What they are saying in effect is that I must have a gun because some day I may want to or have to kill somebody.

We Americans should examine our fascination with guns and violence. If you just have to have your guns stop and look in the mirror some day and ask yourself why. Why do I need an instrument designed with one purpose, to kill something? Does it make me feel powerful, does it fill some primeval urge, am I living in such a troubled society that I am convinced I must have a gun for protection?

Scan your TV lineup tonight or any night and see how many shows have a “V” designation for violence. Does pervasive violence serve some useful or educational purpose? Have we really sunk to the point where we can’t distinguish between entertainment and violence? Apparently the answer is yes. We are shocked and horrified when a sick mind goes over the edge and acts, yet night after night we seek entertainment in the same acts. We allow our children to become desensitized with video games, arcades, movies, even some music built on pure violence and glorification of shooting and killing, hey, you win the game if you kill them all before your ammo runs out.

I know many people won’t agree with me, but it seems to me the discussion needs to go beyond “the right to bear arms.” There will always be crazy people doing horrible things, easy access to weapons designed for mass, rapid killing should not be their tool.

One right-wing radio commentator says the solution is an armed officer in our schools presumably so they can have a gun fight with crazy intruders. Others tout school lockdown, student drills, and other measures. I heard a representative from one state talking about training and arming some school personnel.  Is this how we define our civilized society?  This is too important to let the NRA and its PAC define how we live.

In the last few days I have overheard several parents trying to explain Sandy Hook to their children. They struggled, and all they came up with in the end was, ” You don’t have to worry, that’s not going to happen here.” I suspect parents have said that before…and they were wrong.

Early on I heard one name of a child killed, Noah. Noah was somebody’s grandson. Noah could have been my grandson.

20 comments

  1. Here’s why I need my gun. The bad guys have them. And always will.

    Bad guys prey on the weak and unprotected. I refuse to be either. When you can GUARANTEE my safety, I’ll quit taking responsibility for myself and my family. But when the bad guy does show up, the first thing most want to do is … call the guys with guns and hope they get there in time.

    Like

    1. No disagreement here, amcit, that bad guys will get guns despite our laws in the United States, as our nation governs today. However, read and listen to the facts about all other civilized nations in the free world where guns are virtually impossible to obtain by ordinary citizens and / or criminals (notably Japan and Australia). Those countries have virtually no deaths due to guns. Those facts and statistics cannot be denied. It is time for a revolutionary change in laws governing gun ownership in this nation right now. WE CAN DO IT! The news conference by the NRA today was truly appalling! A consummate idiot who is clearly not speaking for the majority of the four million NRA members spoke and should be silenced. NRA members should rise up and remove this mental case from their organization. NRA members should then join their fellow Americans and work together for a better tomorrow.

      Like

  2. The problem is no accountability. We don’t enforce the laws we have. So you’re going to tell me what types of guns I can have? How big of a dog I may own? How about what size engine I can have in my car? Oh I know, you’re going to tell me how big my house can be or how many I can have! Get a grip. Yes, it was very tragic, but if he wanted those children dead, it would have happened. That’s the risk if you will, of having a free society. Check out the crime rates in those states that are “shall issue” with concealed carry permits. Look at the senior citizen in Florida who was armed, stopped thugs armed with bats and a gun in their tracks at a internet cafe. I have an idea Mr Quinn, move to Australia, pretty country, and residents get to keep their firearms in an armory and only get them when they sign them out to go to the range! Surely those citizens are safe!
    Ok, here is another angle, I belong to a sportsmans club that hosts an annual youth outdoor day. For no charge, we expose kids from age 7-17 to outdoor activities from fly fishing, archery, Canoeing, and yes firearms. Air rifles, shotguns, and pistols. I am a certified pistol instructor, and enjoy the sense of accomplishment and confidence the kids display when they walk up to the target and see how well they did. It’s a process of class instruction and hands on, culminating with a paper Target they can hang on the refrigerator with the center shot out of it.
    Yes Mr Quinn, we have no need for those big fast cars/trucks that drunks kill so many innocent people,,,or how about no cell phones,,look at all of those texting related accidents!
    There, I’m done.

    Like

    1. Enough with the disingenuous arguments and exagerations. The fact is the murder rate from fire arms in the US is 158 times that in Austrailia; a coincidence no doubt.

      Nobody says you can’t enjoy teaching you son to shoot a gun if that’s your thing or that you can’t go shoot at targets. That is a far cry from having a cache of weapons and a few hundred rounds of ammo in your house. I have owned a 22 rifle since I was fourteen that I used at a target range and shooting at tin cans, but I don’t keep any ammunition in the house.

      Explain to me the obsession with guns, with no one telling you what type of guns you can own. These are guns, weapons; we are talking about something designed primarily to kill.

      We have no problem accepting that we need to take a test and pay a fee to drive a car or losing that privilege if we violate the rules, but we can’t have stricter standards on guns in our possession?

      Exactly what is so bad with keeping your guns in a secure place and putting them back there when you are done shooting targets?

      Like

      1. I have listened to several opponents of laws regulating gun control and ownership on cable news TV today. They are saying that they need their assault rifles and other military weapons for protection when “the government comes to get them”??? They seem to be largely rural midwest and southern-fried nut cases. I don’t know why they fear the “government coming to get them?” What are they? Maybe they’re moonshiners, continuing slave owners or sex slave trafficers? Perhaps they are polluting our land and our water supply with industrial and farm wastes? Why do they fear “the government”? I obey the laws of our land and I have no fear of our government? “PADDLE FASTER – I HEAR BANJOS!”

        Like

    2. Gary, I guess you enjoy teaching young children how to kill animals and people with guns. Can you enjoy a “sense of accomplishment” by teaching children how to kill animals and people with sharp sticks and rocks rather than with assault rifles? Do really believe that a ban on assault rifles will ultimately result in regulating the size of dog you are allowed to own? You can’t be serious! Or, if you are serious, you can’t be sane. I certainly hope the authorities are monitoring your activities and communications. You sound really dangerous to me.

      Like

      1. Teaching people how to safely enjoy shooting sports sounds dangerous? Maybe to the in educated. Yes, I see the government telling me what firearms one can own is just another infringement on my freedom. I believe in the freedom to do as one pleases as long as it doesn’t keep others from doing the same. I don’t care how many bottles of wine you have, what religion you practice, how may knives you may collect or what cigars you smoke. Just do it responsibly. I don’t care if you don’t wear a helmet when you ride your motorcycle. Should any of your “hobbies” negatively impact others, then yes, we have a problem.

        Like

    3. This is a debate that can and does incorporate a great deal of emotion and easily degrades into a shouting match with name calling and irrational arguments. It is too important of an issue; however, to let that dominate the discussion. I think it is important to boil it down to the bottom line, which, in my mind, is that nobody wants to impinge on your right to own a gun or even multiple guns. The issue lies with a citizens right to own an instrument that is designed for and can be used to partake in mass killings in short periods of time. Nobody is talking about taking away your Smith and Wessen revolver or even a high powered single shot rifle but when you start talking about semi automatic weapons that can fire of 20, 30 or even 100 shots in a matter of 30 seconds or a minute, that is a separate issue altogether. Those weapons only use is to kill a large number of people in a short amount of time. You cannot argue that you need that kind of gun for hunting or even to protect yourself from an intruder.

      If there is an insistence on owning those guns because you like to shoot them only at gun ranges, then surely you wouldn’t be opposed to a compromise by which severe regulation of the magazines and ammo are in place in which only gun ranges could sell the ammo and customers could not take the magazines off premise? I’m not even sure I would be comfortable with that but it’s that type of rational discussion we need to start to have because, and I say this without a hint of anger or provocation, I have gotten to the point where I don’t care about infringing on your right to own these weapons. And I think much of society is now leaning in that direction after this horrific incident. So, if the NRA doesn’t start engaging in some rational, thoughtful discussions about limiting semi automatic weapons, they may find themselves fighting a losing battle in which we see even stricter limitations put in place.

      Like

      1. The second amendment to our United States constitution was written into that document to REQUIRE the citizens of the recently united states to maintain arms and “regulated militias” for the purpose of protecting and defending their newly formed Federal Government. It was NOT intended to give those citizens the right to bear arms to protect themselves from their newly formed Federal Government. The framers of the constitution were NOT afraid of tyranny from the Federal Government that they had just created.

        Like

      2. Not exactly true, many people were against a strong federal government based on their experience with England. That’s why there were state militia and not a federal army which didn’t fully happen until the war of 1812.

        Like

      3. We are basically saying the same thing. With no federal army, state militias were formed to protect their states’ federal union from foreign nations. Since the federal government had no army, the citizens of the states did not need to be armed to protect themselves from the federal government that they had just created. And, now many weak-minded citizens have become convinced that the 2nd Amendment was written to protect them from the very same federal government that they have elected. For reasons beyond my comprehension, these people fear the government which has provided life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to our citizens for 237 years. These morons cling to their assualt weapons and high-capacity magazines as “Second Amendment rights”. Whenever any of these crazies commit crimes warranting federal intervention and arrest (as many of them certainly will), (James Yeager, et al.) they need to understand that an assault rifle with a 30-round magazine will not deter a National Guard tank. Can you say Branch Davidians? So throw down your murderous weapons and live in harmony with your fellow citizens of the greatest country on earth.

        Like

  3. Mr. Quinn, usually I agree with you. Not this time. This is a tragic event committed by a very unstable person. Timothy Mcveigh used a rented truck filled with diesel fuel and fertilizer and killed 168 people many of them children. The 911 terrorists used airplanes and killed thousands. Unstable people are always going to exsist and find a way to harm and kill. I am a law abiding citizen and I am the NRA along with many people across this great nation. The second amendment is a right that shall not be infringed. Firearms are not unresticted as you suggest, as you must at least pass a background check by the government. Some states including Conn. are much more restricted. Automatic weapons have been illegal to own since 1968. Why does someone need to own firearms as you ask? Self defense, hunting and sporting uses just to name a few. I can go to the gun club on a saturday afternoon and shoot a couple hundred rounds in a few hours just for the fun of it. I dont expect you to see my side of the subject, but thats another thing that makes this nation great. Law abiding citizens are the only ones that regulation and laws effect. Criminals dont abide by the laws ot the country.

    Like

    1. Don’t post a comment when your information is flawed, your statistics are false and you don’t know what you are talking about.

      Like

      1. Sorry oh wise one. We all cant give such intelligent replies as yours!!! Next time I’ll consult with your all knowing excellence.

        Like

Leave a reply to rdquinn Cancel reply