Will time show Obama to be the most divisive and damaging president in history?

 English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the...

President Jefferson had a vision of expanding America, President Lincoln fought to preserve the union and end slavery, President Kennedy took us to the moon. President Obama takes us to the drug store for free pills.

Even as he enters his second term with a small majority of popular votes our President continues his rhetoric of blame the other guy, they are wrong, I’m right and if you disagree you are an obstructionist. At every opportunity he adds to the toxic partisanship that has plagued us for years. His inaugural speech left no opening for compromise or consideration of another point of view.

Whatever happened to

“an end to the petty grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics.”

from Barack Obama’s first inauguration?

False promises are those politicians make that pander to segments of society, but fail to materialize because they are underfunded, fundamentally flawed or take from others in society. False promises seem to be on the rise.

Can every position of the opposition be wrong just because it does not fit a single-minded ideology? Have we redefined compromise to mean, I’ll agree to doing it my way?

His refusal to seriously recognize the long-term fiscal issues we face in favor of targeting the “wealthy” is telling. Mr Obama likes to play on the popular, inaccurate beliefs held by average Americans in his efforts to change society. That change appears to include more government programs that lead to more dependence, more spending and more taxes. All this is a curious goal at a time when we are realizing that programs put in place decades ago are underfunded and adversely affected by demographics and Congressional tinkering over the years; programs that were intended to supplement, to provide a safety net, but have become a “right,” a necessity, an entitlement.

We are made to feel not uplifted and ready to meet the challenges of the times, but victimized by one villain or another; insurance companies, Wall Street, banks, Republicans, some governors, health care providers and let us not forget the wealthy or more accurately any financially successful American.

The cruel hoax is that while claiming to fight for the middle class, poor and elderly Mr Obama gives more and more reasons for not helping ones self and in the process shutting the door on new opportunity. Americans wait anxiously for the next “free” benefit or undefined “affordable” promise, but are conditioned to avoid asking how this is paid for; what are the true costs.

Whatever happened to hard work, sacrifice, initiative, drive and all the values that past generations used to better themselves and their families and in the process their country?

The inconvenient truth (to borrow a phrase) is that many individuals find solace in a subsistence based on a subsidized lifestyle. To some people (and perhaps a growing number) rising above mediocrity is not worth the effort. The risk is that government programs have the unintended consequence of increasing the number of individuals willing to take this road.

“I am for doing good to the poor, but…I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. I observed…that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.” Benjamin Franklin

Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can do for you.

Do I have that right? Even Jack Kennedy the liberal would not recognize where America is headed.

Noble goals of ending poverty and assuring a robust middle class with unbridled opportunity cannot be legislated. You must bounce off the bounds of a safety net, not become entangled within. Our President talks about a web of programs and promises that cannot help but lower personal responsibility and initiative. Opportunity is not dead, it is there as it always has been for those who rise to meet the challenge, take the risk and welcome the effort. The challenge, risk and effort may be vastly different from the previous century, but that only means we must change, not give up or look for scapegoats to explain our condition.

English: President John F. Kennedy speaks on t...
President John F. Kennedy speaks on the nation’s space effort, , Houston, Texas, September 12, 1962. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Fifty-one years ago another president set us on a path for major achievement. He tested our will, our skills and imagination. Today our major goals are free abortions, gay marriage and mandated health coverage as “dependents” for children who are married, employed and self-sufficient.

We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too. – JFK Rice Speech 1962

I refuse to believe that the American dream is dead. We need a President who also believes that and is willing to work to prove it rather than move us toward a society where the majority is dependent on the success of the minority.

20130122-075731.jpg July 4, 1894

14 comments

  1. I found it very interesting that a Swedish official has warned the United States that if it plans to continue down the path of expanded social welfare programs it must be prepared for much higher taxes.

    Like

  2. Jerry, you seem to forget GM where bankruptcy laws were ignored, bond holders left holding the bag, unions given part ownership of the Company and stock to fund retiree medical. In that case over the years the unions were at least 50% responsible for the GM bankruptcy with absurd work rules and unaffordable pensions and benefits. The middle class once again shot itself in its foot.

    Like

  3. To poster Jerry, thanks for the book tip. I will read it. Here’s one for you:
    “Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010” , by Charles Murray.

    Murray desribes the ascendency of the top 10-20%, the decay of the bottom 25%, and the stagnation of the middle. But his is not a dreary and inaacurate portrayal of economic class warfare from a neo-marxist.

    Like

    1. Never watch Fox, they are absurd. On the other hand no American dream is stolen. It’s still there for the taking if people adjust their priorities. As an example, while we readily blame the banks and other lenders for the crisis (and clearly they took advantage and manipulated things) they were only able to do so because of the behavior of individuals being imprudent in their financial lives. And, the root cause of job loss or loss of certain lower skill jobs is the changing world structure. In short, Americans were living beyond their means mostly through debt and taking ill-conceived risk.

      Like

      1. If you will take the time to read that book you will understand recent history as it really happened. I know because I lived the history that Smith discusses in his book and I know it to be true. Obama is right when he says, “The very few are doing very well at the expense of the many”.

        Like

      2. Just give one example of how the “very few” have taken anything from the many. How have people earning say $450,000 taken opportunity from others lower on the scale. Have college grads who have unemployment less than 4% taken from high school drop outs with unemployment near 20%? Has Warren Buffett taken away opportunity?

        I hear the rhetoric which plays wheel for the middle class and below, but I still want to know how successful people take from others?

        Dick

        Like

      3. The wealthy few lobbied Congress to change the bankruptcy laws to allow current management to remain in place during a Chapter 11 filing. While in bankruptcy, union contracts were discarded, health benefits diluted, pension plans destroyed, etc. The wealthy ececutives emerged from bankruptcy with huge bonuses and their underlings emerged struggling to remain solvent. I was with a multi-billion dollar corporation and watched it all happen.

        Like

  4. With all due respect I beleive you are very wrong in your opinion of our President. He did call for people to get educated and in doing so they can find a way out of what limits them. He is about providing the support people need to improve their quality of life. Your depiction of someone who is divisive is inaccurate. The truth is in trying to accomplish his agenda it was the Republican majority who limited his agenda and so with the confidence of the majority and by the way his plurality was the greatest in more than a generation for a sitting president, not a, ‘small majority’ as you write, he is strenghtened to take a harder line against his opposition. It is amazing that you characterize the last president as one who set us on a path , well yes he did , that path led to a dillution of the middle class at the expense of the wealthiest of those in our society. Many people lost decent jobs only to be faced with the propsect of taking very low payings ones. In the meantime the heads of those corporations who downsized, right sized or whatever else you want to call it saw incomes soar. This President is only attempting to bring back some of the opportunity for the great numbers of peolpe who have been hurt at the expense of the very rich because it is they who gained immensely by the workings of Mr Bush.

    So while I respect many of the things you write of in your regular blogs in this case I do think you are very mistaken.

    BB

    Like

    1. I wait for someone to explain the connection between the wealthy and the middle class. The former did not and do not take opportunity from the middle class, a changing global economy is the factor.

      Listen carefully to the pattern of the rhetoric and the lack of uplifting challenges to individuals ala Kennedy and Reagan. Rather, solutions involve more government programs detracting from individual initiative.

      Only time will tell of course, but I fear we are headed to a mediocre society that fails to reward initiative and risk taking. When I see on my blog that most people completing a poll believe solving Social Security problems is best done by cutting benefits for higher income Americans it is troublesome in that it reflects a new mindset counter to the entire program.

      Dick

      Richard D Quinn Editor

      http://www.quinnscommentary.com

      Health Insurance Illuminated http://blog.horizonblue.com/

      Like

    2. First, excellent post Mr. Quinn. I wish our elected officials (on either side of the aisle) had the courage of conviction to inspire people to strive for greatness like the past presidents you refer to.

      Second, Bob there is a big difference between “providing opportunity” to the less fortunate and taking from the successful and giving to the less fortunate. Providing opportunity implies supporting someone’s personal efforts (educational assistance to lower income students studying high demand specialties like engineering, industry specific re-training programs for the unemployed, subsidized apprenticeships or internships for the unemployed or recent graduates). Instead, President Obama provides handouts like continuously extending unemployment benefits and mortgage forgivement programs with few hurdles to qualify. A society addicted to government dependency is one that is sapped of its creativity to solve its own economic issues. It becomes complacent, as it is easier to look at a problem and see an excuse to give up rather than a challenge to overcome. All you need to do to see proof is look across the Atlantic to Greece, Spain, France, etc… There is a reason those countries no longer provide major breakthroughs in technology, medicine, manufacturing, or virtually any other economic endeavor. They have lost the will because it is easier to look to the government. This model has been tried many times… And failed many times.

      Third, there was a saying that was pervasive in my house growing up “no matter how good the excuse is why you can’t do something, it’s still an excuse. Do what you have to do to find a way to succeed.” One major problem that I see is that too many people “let life happen to them” and view themselves as victims of their circumstance, rather than taking the attitude of “do what you have to do to succeed”. There is always SOMETHING you can do to better yourself. It may not be easy but if you look hard enough and want it bad enough you can succeed on your own. I wish I heard that sentiment more from our elected officials and society at large.

      Like

Leave a reply to rdquinn Cancel reply