What’s more important, saving for retirement or the children’s college?

2013

Should I save for retirement or for my children’s college?

While I am not a CFP or anything of the type, I spent many years working with thousands of employees helping them manage their retirement and other benefits; in other words managing life events.

To me the answer to the question is simple . . . you save for retirement first.

There are many options for college, grants, loans and scholarships, working, a state school, etc. Even if your child is accepted at Harvard the chances are most of the cost will be covered by the college. While many people, me included, are attracted to the best private colleges and want the best for their children, the best does not necessarily mean we have to risk our future financial security to provide an adequate education for our children.

Unless you are one of the very few Americans with a good, guaranteed defined benefit pension … one where you cannot outlive the monthly annuity and perhaps with a survivor annuity as well, your saving goal must be to assure an adequate income (for you and a survivor) during many years of retirement. While there may be options for college, there are no options for retirement unless your idea of a secure retirement is living on Social Security alone.

While you know when college expenses will occur, that is not true for retirement. You may have a plan to retire at 65 or even work to 70 or beyond, but many times that is not in your control. Ask the people who lost their job at age 55 or 59 or those who were forced to retire early because of illness or those who simply wish they could do something with the rest of their lives other than work.

Furthermore, you are faced with not only saving a sufficient amount, but investing that money over many years hoping to see it grow and then using what you have accumulated to live on for . . . for who knows how many years and therein lies a major part of the challenge.

Finally, consider this. As people are having children older in life many Americans will find that their children are still in college during the years they are retired or about to be. It does little good if college is paid for and mom and dad are unable to pay their bills or have insufficient assets to avoid being a burden on their children in later years.

It seems to me that your primary goal should be a financially secure retirement . . . for your benefit and for your children’s benefit as well.

P.S. None of this does much good if the unthinkable happens, so part of the equation must also be adequate life insurance along the way to retirement. It was quite revealing to me that many of the young family men and women killed in the 9/11 attack had no life insurance; quite irresponsible in my view. In fact, I know of one company affected by the attack that only the week before offered a life insurance program to it’s employees . . . only 30% took any coverage.

A word to the wise or those who should be.

4 comments

  1. Dick, respectfully disagree.

    The best answer is to save all you can for retirement, more than you think you can afford to earmark for retirement. Then, in your 401k or 403b, lobby the plan administrator and the plan sponsor for a 21st century loan program … One designed to provide modest access while at the same time, using a design that all but guarantees repayment (com moment bonds, electronic billing, etc.).

    Save, get the match, invest, accumulate, access money for short term needs via a loan, continue contributing while repaying the loan, rebuilding the account to a greater level for future, larger needs. Repeat as necessary up to and through retirement.

    It changes the effort from one of saving up for retirement to saving along the way to retirement.

    I find, when individuals try to earmark savings, using the “envelope” process, so many live from paycheck to paycheck, that they end up not meeting any of their goals…

    Like

    1. Sorry Jack. I can’t agree with that approach. One pot of money simply discourages people from making a distinction between wants and needs, essentials and luxuries. Even when loans are repaid mandatory via payroll deduction, it’s not a good deal. I had many people take loan after loan and often for frivolous buying and in the process losing growth in their account.

      The other flaw is save “more than you think you can afford”. It seems to me that is too open ended and too subjective. A person may easily underestimate that amount thus compounding the long term problem. I believe people need structure. So in this case I would say save 10% (minimum) off the top and set your standard of living with the balance and ideally with no credit cards, that is what you really can live on … period.

      It can be done at all income levels. People may not like their real standard of living, but living above that number creates nothing but long term problems as we have seen in the recent housing debacle.

      Dick

      Richard D Quinn Editor

      http://www.quinnscommentary.com

      Health Insurance Illuminated http://blog.horizonblue.com/

      Like

      1. I would love to see them follow your recommendations. Few calculate retirement needs. Fewer still know how to convert those to a rate of savings. None can predict what they will encounter at their next six or seven employers. People could reallocate their savings once they take out a loan – as the interest they pay themselves is a fixed income investments. The challenge here was, is, and continues to be that not enough employers offer a plan, many don’t join when first eligible, many don’t save enough when they do enroll and too many take a distribution, a cash out when they change employers. As a result, access via a loan will keep the assets in the plan, and 21st century loan programs will permit use of those monies for short term, intermediate and long term needs. Save, invest, get the match, accumulate, borrow as needed, continue to contribute, repay at the same time, rebuild the account for a larger, future need. Repeat as needed until retirement.

        Borrowing from private sources has been demonstrated to be less financially efficient (much higher interest rates, 18%, 29.99%, or even worse, payday loans). So, where a plan uses 21st century loan banking, such that the loan can continue to be repaid after separation, or even initiated after separation (instead of a taxable, with penalty, withdrawal), your chances of developing good saving habits are much greater.

        Like

Leave a reply to preneedplan Cancel reply