Wind farms and the land we live on … or did

2013
English: Wooden Shoes Amsterdam

Regular readers know I am no fan of wind or solar power, not because I am opposed to green energy or don’t recognize the need to protect our environment, but because I don’t see these options having a long-term viability financially and more importantly because they consume vast amounts of land and in the case of wind turbines are going backward in technology.

In addition, wind turbines create their own environmental problems. See below from the blog windfarmbop.com

A traditional generating unit will use a few hundred acres of land. To get anything close to the equal output of electricity, wind turbines and solar panels consume thousands upon thousands of acres and then at much less reliability and in the process create eyesores across the land. Lack of sun, wind, even the presence of birds can shut down generation. Is this really the way to go?

I can see placing solar panels on top of buildings, on electric poles and even on brown fields unusable for other purposes, but to cover vast areas of desert or open fields is destructive for a very minor gain.

What’s your opinion? Have we found the solution or are we headed in the wrong direction? How much more are you willing to pay for less reliable sources of electricity?

One of the problems of installing a wind farm in an area with a dense bird population is the possibility of impacts between the rotating blades and the animals.

A standard solution used in the industry is the use of a (very expensive) bird radar, a quasi-military technology that can spot very small flying objects and stop the turbines (hopefully) in time.

Working at the development of a wind farm in Jordan we have discovered the existence of an alternative: a Spanish company (Liquen) is developing an “artificial vision” system to be installed on the WTGs.

Basically the system is composed of 2 sets set of high definitions cameras installed on the WTGs or on the MET mast that are filming the space around the turbines, plus speakers for dissuasion sounds.

The software can analyze the images in real time and recognize if a bird is flying toward the machine. If this is the case, several countermeasures are possible:

Warning and dissuasion, using annoying signals. Clearly this signals are optimized to the type of birds in the area

Stop control, whit short duration (<2 minutes) stop of the affected turbine and automatic restart to minimize production loss. According to the company, real time detection is really fast (less than 1 second) and it is possible including in adverse weather conditions (fog, snow, rain) whit a very low power consumption.

The main problem that I see is that the system is effective only when there are at least 200 Lux (that is, from sunrise to sunset). So there is a clear problem with nocturnal birds – I wonder if in the future it will be possible to integrate the system with some kind of night vision, like the military infrared technology.

Another weak point is the low detectability of very small bird (12 centimeters or less): they can be easily spotted only if they came in a large group.

This technology looks promising and it’s not so “embryonic”: it has already been installed in a Vestas wind farm in Greece and several other wind farms around Europe (Spain, Norway and Greece).

2 comments

  1. Where the hell is the Sierra Club or other “earth-friendly” groups when it comes to these eyesores called wind turbines? These props are ugly, offensive to the eyes and ears, and a blight on our beautiful landscapes.

    Like

Leave a reply to Michael N. Metcalf Cancel reply