If it sounds too good to be true… the math and logic behind insurance exchange premiums

2013

Let’s do a little math and see if it is possible for premiums in the new health insurance exchanges to be 50% lower than comparable plans on the open market. The following article is from a post on Health Insurance Illuminated, a blog I write for a Blue Cross-Blue Shield plan. Click on the link below and see how the claims for premium reductions may not stand up to simple math. What is more likely is that in Republican states the premiums are higher and in Democratic states they are lower … who knew?

If it sounds too good to be true…

Numerous media reports are making fantastic claims about how the Affordable Care Act, President Obama’s health care reform law, is working to reduce health care costs. A recent New York Times article even suggests New York residents premiums for individual policies on the soon to be opened healthcare marketplaces will be 50% lower than today. Other stories indicate individuals are benefitting from rebates and lower health insurance prices due to increased competition.

Be skeptical.

Let’s think about this. If, in fact, we were comparing apples to apples and premium savings were significant, where did the savings come from?

via If it sounds too good to be true….

We should note that because New York has open enrollment without regard to pre-existing conditions, it’s premiums now are considerably higher than most other states and without mandatory enrollment the adverse selection problem is critical thus driving up premiums.

4 comments

  1. Dick, why so cynical?

    Did you see the recent announcement by HHS that premiums are much lower than originally predicted? See: Market Competition Works: Proposed Silver Premiums in the 2014 Individual and Small Group Markets Are Nearly 20% Lower than Expected, ASPE, HHS Issue Brief – July 2013

    So, they looked at the premium estimates made by the Congressional Budget Office back in 2012 where the CBO projected the cost to 2016 for the average family for coverage in the second lowest cost silver plan. They then adjusted the estimate to reflect single individual market coverage in 2014 by using a single coverage to family coverage ratio of 1: 2.7, trended back at 5.5% per year to 2014, then adjusted for higher levels of reinsurance payments in 2014, yielding an estimated 2014 single premium of $4,700 – then compared it to the eleven state average, using an age-weighted estimate of enrollment.

    I believe it was Descartes who said: “There is a lie, a damned lie, and then there is a statistic.”

    Like

      1. Hear, hear. Politicians can call $321/month (the average price in the California exchange, according to the Los Angeles Times) a 29% price cut, as Covered California called it. Or call it an 80% hike, as the Times called it. However, $321 is still $321, no matter how you label it, and it’s a LOT less affordable than $95 to pay the penalty and remain uninsured.

        http://healthpolicyandmarket.blogspot.com/2013/05/rate-shock-in-californiathe-new-health.html

        Like

Leave a Reply