Tax and spend; Americans need (more) help, boost Social Security benefits

2013

Here is what Senator Elizabeth Warren said in a recent speech promoting the idea of raising taxes and Social Security benefits.

“A generation ago, middle-class families were able to put away enough money during their working years to make it through their later years with dignity. On average, they saved about 11% of their take home pay while working. Many paid off their homes, got rid of all their debts, and retired with strong pensions from their employers. And where pensions, savings, and investments fell short, they could rely on Social Security to make up the difference.”

The fact is “strong pensions” were never a source of income for the majority of Americans. (Note 1)

Now let’s look at a generation ago and beyond for Sen Warren. Past generations didn’t have to get rid of their debt because they didn’t use debt, they bought what they could afford without plastic or the home equity ATM. They saved because they had learned their lesson from the Great Depression. They paid off their homes because they lived in their homes for a lifetime not moving every five years to add more square footage or another bathroom or walk-in closet (a what?). Actually they didn’t need more space because they didn’t accumulate more stuff and what they had fit nicely in a normal closet. The house they did own they could afford because their lenders weren’t strong armed by the government to give anyone breathing a mortgage.

They could live on one income with a spouse at home actually raising the children and didn’t have time to blame teachers and institutions for the failure of their children’s education. Children were born to married couples. Along came the sixties and our enlightened liberals convinced women they were not fulfilled in the home, but rather their value was in careers and everything changed. The result is that now women have to work because the generation so drove up the prices of homes they are unaffordable to most single earner homes. The result is the household has been redefined to the point of destruction. According to a Huffington Post blog, “as of 2011, a full 62 percent of women age 20 to 24 who gave birth in the previous 12 months weren’t married, according to the just released Census report,” over 50% of births in the US are to single women. And it gets worse ( Note 2)

And about that 11% saving, prior generations saved first and then figured out what was left to spend. This generation not only does the opposite, but also spends more than it has to spend without debt.

So given what recent generations have done to the family unit, to prudent spending and saving and fiscal priorities, it’s quite clear the top problem we must deal with is raising Social Security benefits by raising taxes on the people who aren’t saving, paying off their mortgages or getting rid of debt. Gee, that all makes sense to me. 😳

The progressive mind is a scary thing. It has the ability to flash right by the causes of a problem while creating a solution for the result in an endless quest to actually solve nothing. You know, like a fifty-year war on poverty. In this case boosting the Social Security benefit by $60 a month wipes out irresponsible behavior for generations to come. These academic types need to get out more, look around and see how people are spending money and setting their fiscal priorities.

******
(Note 1) Huffington Post. From 1980 through 2008, the proportion of private wage and salary workers participating in DB pension plans fell from 38 percent to 20 percent (Bureau of Labor Statistics 2008; Department of Labor 2002). Why? Well there are two major reasons; first a myriad of federal laws and regulations and second a changed work environment away from industrial type job for life jobs. More mobile workers benefited less and less from defined benefit benefits based on long periods of service.

(Note 2)
** From 2006-2010 55 percent of women had cohabited by age 25.
** 40 percent of couples living together for the first time got married within three years; that means 60 percent did not.
** Nearly one in five women got pregnant during the first year of living together.
** 23 percent of recent births among women aged 15-44 occurred while living with someone they weren’t married to — up from 14 percent in 2002.

Where did the other 77 percent of the women go when they had their babies? My guess is they went home to their parents, where they likely rely on family to help care for and pay for their children.

AARP bears out my suspicions. Two years ago, it reported that 4.9 million children under 18 in America — 7 percent — live in grandparent-headed households. That was an increase from 4.5 million ten years earlier. At the time, many blamed it on the economy forcing adult children and their families to move home. But 20 percent of those kids — almost a million — had neither parent living in the household and the grandparents were completely responsible for their basic needs.

8 comments

  1. Dick, she is only the most recent of the academics who bemoan our devolvement into retirement chaos – See also The Great Risk Shift, The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health Care, and Retirement–And How You Can Fight Back, Jacob S. Hacker; or When I’m Sixty-Four: The Plot against Pensions and the Plan to Save Them, Teresa Ghilarducci. There are others as well. All are progressives. None has ever held a real job with P&L responsibility.
    Simply, they lie. They speak of a past that never existed. The government’s own data tell a much more accurate story.
    Listen to these academics and surely a couple of generations ago we had Retirement Nirvanna, a Golden Age, Right?! Well, today, in 2010, just under 10%, less than 1 in 10 adults age 65+ live in a family with income below the official U.S. poverty line, or federal poverty level (FPL) – measured based on size of household. Go back 45 years, to 1968, and the poverty rate among adults age 65 and older was 25%!

    Like

  2. Love the liberal bashing here, you would think if we can just stop the liberals and go with the right wing capitalism our society would be peachy. The right wing ideology has played a large role in producing the none saving society we live in today. One of the so called great right wing President (Ronal Regan) lead by example by cutting taxes to levels that we could not even afford, while increasing spending. Yes, spending is a problem but if you are already spending the money, cutting taxes will just explode that problem. Also, the right wing capitalism world uses that desire to spend to their advantage. Let’s face it, everyone loves to spend money and ALL (both left and right) push for that spending. The capitalists world pushes credit cards and spend billions on advertising just to get you to spend your money. Just look at the new black Friday, which is now Thursday (Thanksgiving). For decades everyone from Government spending to the Capitalist business world try to get you to spend your money. This isn’t because of the liberal crazy socialist thinking but the desire we ALL have to spend. You can take Elizabeth Warrens remarks whichever way you want but she is trying to lessen the burden we ALL will face in the future and that is a generation of retires whom may have a quarter of savings at best then they actually need to retire. We are so out of touch both left and right and we ALL have built a world that is not going to look anything like the so called Golden Era so maybe the best thing we can do is face it and work together to lessen the burden that faces ALL of us. I for one, will retire without a pension, healthcare that is in question (even before Obamacare), and Social Security that may or may not be there, it depends on who you ask. But the generation before me tells me that we are Liberals and you should not rely on Government. You should vote for people preaching less government and less taxes but please make sure you don’t touch our social security or Medicare, so only do these changes to the people at 55 and below. We will not fix the issues until we are ALL willing to pay for what we want from Government and find ways to address the high levels of inequality, but that is too liberal for the generation before me that believes we all should sacrifice just as long as it doesn’t involve me.

    Like

    1. I think you miss the point. It’s not just less or more government it is really about personal responsibility and life choices. Government can’t solve those problems and the message of the Warrens is deceiving everyone into thinking it can.

      The extreme right is no better creating the impression we don’t need taxes or government which isn’t true either.

      Like

      1. I agree Goverment cannot solve all of our problems and we definitely need more personal responsibilities. That is one of the reasons I am so mad with the Republican Party these days. I onced believed in their fiscal respondsibility pich but once they moved away from a dollar for a dollar to a do nothing but cut taxes regardless of the outcome, they lost me. But I understand your point and that is one of the reasons I enjoy reading your work. I don’t want to live in that left or right wing bubble so many do in today’s political divide. Thanks

        Like

    2. I agree with and understand the point dick is making. While he is older than me (not by that much either) we lived through a similar period in history. My uncles and grandparents lived through the great depression. My brothers and I were weaned on tales of catastrophic economic conditions and social inequality.Obviously, I am not from your generation.
      I was born and raised in a cold water flat as well. I tell you this not to effect your sympathy but to suggest I don’t think I would have become the person i am without a sense of personal responsibility and “good choices”(mostly) along the way. Needless to say(like most) I have made many mistakes and bad choices as well. No one is perfect nor are we all equal.
      Yes I said we are not all equal and never will be .It took me some time to accept this basic truism of the human condition. I’m all in on “liberty and justice for all”, but equality – I don’t think so.
      As you seem to have an open mind despite your liberal leanings i would suggest the work of Thomas Sowell (Chicago School Of Economics) see Conquests and Cultures (1998) or the Quest for Cosmic Justice(2002).
      Yes he is a conservative economist/liberaterian and brilliant writer. A black man born and raised in Harlem (also grew up in fifties,didn’t move to a apartment that had hot water until he was nine years old and had to deal with blatant racism and discrimination growing up) .And yet look at all he has accomplished .
      I think Sowell, is a prime example of the personal responsibility and choices Dick speaks of.
      As far as the” we all love to spend thing”. I don’t agree but would defend your right to do so ….as an individual…..as long as you don’t ask me to pay for it. As there is a vast world of difference between what individuals do in spending and what governments do with spending other peoples money in attempting to achieve social and economic equality.
      And I agree, I think Republicans have caught up with the Democrats when it comes to spending despite the rhetoric.Nevertheless, I don’t think we can better the situation by encouraging the “nanny state”or economic dependency on the government in the name of economic equality.IMHO, this will only lessen personal responsibility and limit our choices (and liberty).

      Like

  3. well put dick…..As a recovering liberal, transitioned to independent thinker/voter to a now conservative leaning Republican, I can state unequivocally and through personal experience that progressive government (and the liberal ideology supporting it)…is the very essence of tax and spend thinking and of course our economic destruction. And of course what you are addressing is “values”and how we got to where we are is simply a matter of connecting the dots.

    I own a multi-dwelling in a thoroughly entrenched democratic northern new jersey town. It is a one party town . With its progressive leadership all we get is higher and higher taxes , more and more spending ,declining property values and escalating crime.

    This saddens me as I grew up in this town. As the holiday season approaches I think of the classic “Its a wonderful life”. Like many neighborhoods across the nation, my home town has gone from Bedford Falls to Pottersville !

    As for E.Warren more concentrated reading on the Austrian school of economics (Frederick Huyak in particular) would benefit her immensely.But wait, I don’t think they teach that stuff at Harvard .

    Like

Leave a Reply