2015 Medicare Part B Premiums and Deductibles to Remain the Same as Last Two Years

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
News Release

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
News Division

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, October 9, 2014

2015 Medicare Part B Premiums and Deductibles to Remain the Same as Last Two Years

Premiums, copays and deductibles for other Medicare programs for 2015 also announced

Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Sylvia Burwell announced today that next year’s standard Medicare Part B monthly premium and deductible will remain the same as the last two years. Medicare Part B covers physicians’ services, outpatient hospital services, certain home health services, durable medical equipment, and other items. For the approximately 49 million Americans enrolled in Medicare Part B, premiums and deductibles will remain unchanged in 2015 at $104.90 and $147 respectively. This leaves more of seniors’ cost of living adjustment from Social Security in their pockets.

According to the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, as compared to Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections for 2015 made in 2009, premiums will be more than $125 lower over the course of a year.

“Thanks to slower health care cost growth within Medicare since the passage of the Affordable Care Act, next year’s Medicare Part B monthly premium will remain unchanged for the second consecutive year,” said Secretary Burwell. “The Affordable Care Act is working to improve affordability and access to quality care for seniors and people with disabilities.”

“The stabilization of Part B premiums is another example of how we are containing health care costs to provide a more sustainable and affordable health delivery system. The Administration has taken important steps to improve the quality of care while keeping the cost of Medicare premiums and deductibles the same,” said CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner. “This means even greater financial and health security for our seniors next year as their premiums will remain unchanged.”

Over the past four years, per capita Medicare spending growth has averaged 0.8 percent annually, much lower than the 3.1 percent annual increase in per capita GDP over the same period.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services also announced today that for the small number of beneficiaries who pay Medicare Part A monthly premiums, their monthly bill will drop $19 in 2015 to $407. Medicare Part A covers inpatient hospital, skilled nursing facility, and some home health care services. Although about 99 percent of Medicare beneficiaries do not pay a Part A premium since they have at least 40 quarters of Medicare-covered employment, enrollees age 65 and over and certain persons with disabilities who have fewer than 30 quarters of coverage pay a monthly premium in order to receive coverage under Part A. Beneficiaries who have between 30 and 39 quarters of coverage may buy into Part A at a reduced monthly premium rate which is $224 for 2015, a decrease of $10 from 2014.

The Medicare Part A deductible that beneficiaries pay when admitted to the hospital will be $1,260 in 2015, a modest increase of $44 from this year’s $1,216 deductible. The Part A deductible covers beneficiaries’ share of costs for the first 60 days of Medicare-covered inpatient hospital care in a benefit period. Beneficiaries must pay an additional $315 per day for days 61 through 90 in 2015, and $630 per day for hospital stays beyond the 90th day.

For beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities, the daily co-insurance for days 21 through 100 in a benefit period will be $157.50 in 2015, compared to $152.00 in 2014.

Since 2007, beneficiaries with higher incomes have paid higher Part B monthly premiums. These income-related monthly premium rates, which affect less than 5 percent of people with Medicare, will also remain the same as they were in 2014.

12 comments

    1. Like I already said Vince (see below): “Don’t bother to apologize I am, according to you, too “ungrateful” to deserve it. Besides due to the “amnesia” you accuse me of having I would probably forget it soon after you made it. Thanks for doing as I asked by not bothering to apologize.

      Like

  1. Tommee-Oliver said, “We (the current generation) had to shift for ourselves. Let the following generations shift for themselves.”

    Wow, ungratefulness and amnesia. What a combo.

    The baby boomers had new schools built for them, new ball parks, new colleges. They were the first generation who went en masse to higher education without fighting a war beforehand. Shift for themselves? The baby boomers were spoiled like none before them. Viet Nam? Oh, for some there was that. But millions got off the hook with college deferments (Clinton, Cheney) or weedled themselves into the National Guard ( Bush 2.)

    I was born in 1947, the booms second year.

    With apologies to Churchill, never before had so much been given to so many who deserved so little.

    Walt Kelley wrote the famous Pogo line back in the 60’s, as applicable today as then, We have met the enemy, and he is us.

    Like

    1. A ’49er here. First I take umbrage on your dismissive ; “Viet Nam? Oh, for some there was that”. Yeh, Vince, I was one of the “some” and in the thick of it. Were you there? Even as a REMF? Oh and before I went to that “Sunny Tropic Paradise” I had a college student deferment. The old 2S. Don’t bother to apologize I am, according to you, to “ungrateful” to deserve it but do me a big favor…never tell a Vet again “Thank you for your service” especially if they are a Viet Nam vet. Besides due to the “amnesia” you accuse me of having I would probably forget it soon after you said it.
      Ok now down to business…
      We were too young to do anything about it whilst Mummy and Daddy voted in the “spendocrats” (Democrats)…it took 50 years until Newt Gingrich to get them out their majority in Congress where they were busy playing their version of Robin Hood).
      The schools I went to were all built in the 20s and 30s. The baby boomers had new ballparks built? I thought that was the owners who built them…if you’re talking about little league fields some grass, base paths, lime, a few benches and hurricane fencing that is hardly a ton of money even for a small town…
      New colleges? Please name one that was founded in the 50s and 60s…oh wait! there was one. The “well known” Eisenhower College in upstate New York which was founded in 1968 and closed I think in the 1980s and it wasn’t attended by all the “boomers” so there was one new colleges built.
      We didn’t fight a war? Gee I didn’t know that was a prerequisite to living the proper life but if it is so, I did.
      Bet you’re getting a nice pension and other earnings too Vince and you probably can afford to forgo a SS COLA and accept SS “windfall” reduced benefits as well as claim we did not shift for ourselves?
      How did we (you) buy the homes, cars and other things that fueled the economy and life’s enjoyment (and probably kept you employed and raking in the “dough”) by getting the money from Mummy and Daddy or by working our butts off morning, noon and night?
      You almost sound as if you’re mad that “ye boomers” didn’t mob the recruiting stations to enlist. Did you?
      With apologies but it sounds as if you are an angry man doing anything to make a point including calling names, making up facts, using generalities and twisting quotes but not making a cogent argument based on and backed with any hard facts (i.e.: how many new schools, how many new ballparks, how many “new colleges” (oh we did that one) and at what cost?
      I think you owe me, Churchill, Walt Kelley and your generation and apology. I made my current position in life the old fashioned way…I earned it!

      Like

  2. I know that Dick…2% is not in the cards this year but we’ll get close won’t we? However, I see you again dodged the direct question …specifically @ the Medicare Part B news…I asked…”Isn’t this great news Dick?” You didn’t reply well let me ask again…Isn’t it great news Dick?

    Like

    1. Yes in the short term, no in the longer term. Medicare has fiscal problems too and if I were running things there would always be an increase in deductibles and co-pays even modest ones just to keep up with inflation. Just like the COLA and the minimum wage that some people want tagged to inflation.

      That’s prudent in my view and it assures that current users and not the following generation picks up their fair share.

      Like

      1. Thankfully Dick you are not running things so we get no increases.
        We (the current generation) had to shift for ourselves. Let the following generations shift for themselves. We can’t be Mommy and Daddy to future generations…nowhere in the Constitution does it obligate today’s seniors or anybody for that matter to make sure that future generations only picks up their “fair share” (and what constitutes a “fair share”). Past generations didn’t make sure that we would only have to pick up our “fair share” why my generation so obligated?

        Like

      2. Well, you are probably right, but I worry about my children and grandchildren. I had my shot at things and did okay, they are not going to have it so well. I’m fortunate to have a pension. None of my kids do plus it’s harder to save for many reasons especially employers shifting more burden for health care onto workers.

        Like

  3. Huzzah!!! A decrease in the Part B monthly premium and deductible would have been better but this is the next best thing. Now if the SS COLA could come in at 2% (or more) I would be one happy camper but right now I have the smile of a jack o’lantern on my face. Isn’t this great news Dick? Thanks for posting it. (you even beat Drudge to this story)

    Like

      1. I know that Dick…2% is not in the cards this year but we’ll get close won’t we? However, I see you again dodged the direct question …specifically @ the Medicare Part B news…I asked…”Isn’t this great news Dick?” You didn’t reply well let me ask again…Isn’t it great news Dick?

        Like

Leave a reply to rdquinn Cancel reply