Right on cue the Obama machine has started its whining; “Republicans did it too!” This time it’s immigration and indeed Reagan did sign an immigration reform law in 1986. But there is the rub, it was a law passed by Congress and a law written on a bipartisan basis plus the law contained a number of requirements. It was not an executive order without Congressional action. It was not enacted by a President who could not compromise, negotiate, or lead. This blaming the opposition is more childish each time it is raised. If you think about it, such an excuse is actually an indictment of the ineffectiveness of those using it.
The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), Pub.L. 99–603, 100 Stat. 3445, enacted November 6, 1986, also known as the Simpson-Mazzoli Act, signed into law by Ronald Reagan on November 6, 1986, is an Act of Congress which reformed United States immigration law. The Act[1]
required employers to attest to their employees’ immigration status;
made it illegal to hire or recruit illegal immigrants knowingly;
legalized certain seasonal agricultural illegal immigrants, and;
legalized illegal immigrants who entered the United States before January 1, 1982 and had resided there continuously with the penalty of a fine, back taxes due, and admission of guilt; candidates were required to prove that they were not guilty of crimes, that they were in the country before January 1, 1982, and that they possessed minimal knowledge about U.S. history, government, and the English language.
At the time, the Immigration and Naturalization Service estimated that about four million illegal immigrants would apply for legal status through the act and that roughly half of them would be eligible.
via Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Richard, this is a great point!!! There is a great difference between what transpired under Reagan as a result of the Congressional Act and what is purportedly going to happen now. Mr. Bordone ignores the difference. And you are quite right that Harry Reid has been sitting on over two hundred bills passed by the House; should the President sign all of them also to force the Senate to go along? Whatever you may think of the immigration situation and how to fix its problems, the fundamental issue is that the President must recognize the limits of his power under Article II of the Constitution. The limited powers of Congress are listed in Article I, suggesting that to the Framers, the Congress was the most important branch of government. In any event, even if you think that the Senate bill is a good one, it is Constitutionally fundamental that the ends do not justify the means.
LikeLike
.
Bottom line is this… Reagan was the first president to sign an amnesty
bill into law which legalized millions of illegal aliens.
Reagan was the first president to let the camel’s nose under the tent.
Reagan presided over the acceptance of amnesty… giving a green light
to a massive illegal alien demographic army that continues to invade.
Many nation-destroying policies have arisen during Republican administrations…
when their [so-called] “conservative base” appears to go back to sleep.
Republicans and Democrats have been playing good cop / bad cop for decades.
In reality there is not a dime’s worth of difference between the two political parties..
which is why I don’t identify with either.
.
LikeLike
Dick,
In this case I take issue as the Senate passed a bill well over a year ago. The republican house leader has refused to bring the bill to a vote. I believe this issue need s the executive action to put forward an order so as to move the congress to act. If there was no Senate bill that has passed then I would agree with you but Boehner has not placed the bill for a vote. The President has repeatedly asked the Hose to pass a bill but they do nothing. What would you have him do. By the way from what I have read the Senate bill was largely a bipartisan effort to fashion a reasonable law. What other means are at the Presidents offing?
LikeLike
I agree the Senate bill contains a lot to work with and negotiate. And it could be a starting point, but I not think with something this important an executive order is the way to go. Reid has done the same thing as Boehner holding up votes which is why I guess most people think Congress is dysfunctional. It seems to me movement on both sides, horse trading with other things important to left and right should be possible.
LikeLike