No rational person can oppose education for all. In addition, it is clear that few Americans can afford the cost of higher education without some assistance be it loans or grants.
Many years ago I attended two different community colleges and then a state college. I was not a kid, I was in my 30s married with children. My education from those institutions was pathetic. The instructors were horrible and many displayed a “who cares” attitude. In short, it was pretty much a waste of time and money ( your money by the way since I received VA benefits for some of the tuition) except I ended up with a piece of paper saying I had a Bachelor’s Degree. Interestingly, after all these years the first county college I attended remains near the bottom of the ranking list with only a 21% student success rate. That doesn’t say much after forty years and it also doesn’t say much for the motivation or qualifications of the students either. Score one for inequality.
First, do we really want to encourage free anything? Affordable based on circumstances sure, but free to anyone seems to open the door to people with no skin in the game so to speak. Somewhat along the lines of free health care where we are going in the opposite direction.
Where this idea has been implemented there is a very high utilization rate, but that doesn’t mean success? The President’s proposal contains several caveats to assure serious students and to some extent better quality colleges. That is important because getting even a modest 2.5 GPA at a school like those I attended is meaningless. Saying there will be quality measures is not making them work.
Not all community colleges are equal so it is important not to just throw cash at a goal and walk away assuming success. Here is an evaluation of the Nation’s community colleges; it doesn’t appear too encouraging. Let’s hope we do not throw good money after bad.
I am always leery of government projects such as this because of the bureaucracy involved, but this initiative is worth a try. We can only hope it’s done right. But there is more to be done. As with health care, subsidizing the cost of a service is only part of the equation, we also need to address the reasons for the underlying costs, in this case tuition costs.
We seem to live in a world of “free” stuff for everyone. I sure hope we don’t run out of other people’s money.
In a recent Rasmussen poll, voters tend to like President Obama’s idea of free community college for millions of students – as long as it doesn’t cost them anything.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 47% of Likely U.S. Voters favor a new government program that would make community college tuition-free. Thirty-nine percent (39%) are opposed. Fourteen percent (14%) are undecided.
Say what? As long as it doesn’t cost them anything? Are people really that stupid? Really?



There was a time when people with an 8th grade education did very well in the world. Today I think that employers are using the excuse of a college degree requirement in place of an effective HR department and job training programs. Businesses are complaining that college grads are not trained for the business world. I realize that the known knowledge in the world is growing at an exponential rate and high schools are trying to teach it all but they are failing at the basics. In the 35+ years since I graduated high school I have seen the dumbing down of the high school education. In an effort to ensure high school graduates had the required basic proficiency, the State of NJ started testing and schools started teaching the test in the late 1970s. NJ also realized that schools were pushing students through high school so it started requiring colleges to administer basic skill tests in reading and math to all college freshmen. The quality of a high school education in NJ is now measured by the percentage of its students that go to college, not the not of students who actually graduate from college. School also are judge on the percentage of students who pass the state proficiency test thus the schools are committed to teaching of the test.
It is with this history I would like to point out that 1) not all kids should go to college and 2) some kids need to fail and drop out of school, and 3) I should not have to pay to for this experiment for these kids to figure out if they should be in college. Obama should take the money that it would cost for free college and fix the programs that we already have. Fixed or get rid of No Child Left Behind. Make a high school education valuable again. Fixed the college loan and grant process to avoid saddling college graduates with debt for life. For kids who drop out of school, give them alternative trade schools and get America manufacturing things again. These kids may never make six figures but they should be able to support themselves. Lets fund existing education programs instead of cutting existing programs and starting new programs we cannot afford.
In the unlikely reality that free college education gets funded, working in fast food will soon require master degrees since ALL colleges are in business to make a profit and the workforce will be flooded with more degree people than jobs for those degrees.
LikeLike
You raise some very valid points.
LikeLike
Capital will need to be invested in community colleges to ready them for the increases in enrollment. And no info available as to where the money will come from. This program is based upon the Tennessee model, and the creator of that one said it would not work on a national basis.
LikeLike
Larry, stop letting logic and reality get in the way of progressive 😄 Who cares about unintended consequences?
LikeLike