Okay, so this is largely political hype, but you have to wonder, at least I do, what are the people thinking who prepare this stuff and those who accept it on face value? Does anyone do the math or ask questions of logic?
For example, just using the standard CPI what cost $125 in 1980 would cost $359.13 in 2014. So if this man’s premium was about $400 in 2014 he is getting a pretty good deal given that health care inflation would indicate the premium should be $726.45 Are we to assume in the last thirty-one years his income has not increased?
Why should a man who could afford $125 thirty years ago be paying $55 in 2014?
I can show you thousands of working Americans whose monthly payroll deductions for health benefits are $400 or more and who are middle class earners. And by the way, many seniors on Medicare will pay above $400 a month when you add their Medicare Part B premium, their Part D premium and the cost of Medigap coverage.
So, here is a man who has operated his own business for thirty-one years and cannot afford a premium that costs what should be proportionally the same as it did in 1980, why? Why is he still operating a business that apparently has gotten him nowhere in three decades? His medical conditions and his bills are irrelevant to this story. What you see here is simply blatant income redistribution.
So the question is, are you okay with this? It’s your money after all. Should Americans who choose to earn an income that we now decide is inadequate for some reason be subsidized by other Americans who may be in an identical economic state?
Day in the Life: Victor
By: Jared Benoff, U.S. Department of Labor
Fifty-eight-year-old Victor Saldivar is a Utah native. For the past 31 years he has owned and operated Kaos Hair Studios, a small business in Salt Lake City.
Being self-employed, Victor found it was just too expensive to afford health insurance. When he started his business in the 1980s, it cost was about $125 a month, but prices kept going up year after year. Eventually it was over $400 a month and he made the difficult decision to cancel it.
DOL Secretary Perez sits down with Victor in Salt Lake City. However, after doing so he found it was impossible to be seen by a quality doctor. And three years ago, Victor fell ill with pneumonia. He went to a facility where the doctor prescribed him an allergy medicine. His medical bills stacked up and he is still paying them off today.
All this changed when the Affordable Care Act marketplace opened in Utah. Victor remembers being so excited. He called the healthcare.gov call-center to get enrolled in a health plan. With the tax subsidy, he found a plan that costs him $55 per month with a $500 deductible that became effective last June.
In September, though, Victor was having a hard time breathing and thought he might need an inhaler. Because of his health insurance, Victor went to see a doctor who sent him to the emergency room to run his blood work.
The results of the blood work showed something abnormal with his kidneys. After a follow-up CT scan, Victor was diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma – kidney cancer.
He saw a urologist and the decision was made that he would have one of his kidneys removed. On January 8, just a few weeks ago, Victor’s kidney was removed.
“Without the Affordable Care Act,” Victor told Secretary Perez when they sat down to chat in Salt Lake City. “I’d be dead within a year.”
Now, just a few weeks later, Victor is back on his feet and back at work. Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, he’s not worried that he’ll go bankrupt because of his medical bills. “The Doctor removed the cancer and I got my life back,” Victor said.
Running a business — like Kaos Hair Salon — means making tough choices, but choosing health coverage can be easy. Under the Affordable Care Act small businesses are benefiting from new tax credits and protections against excessive price increases.


Obviously, Victor felt his TV, his car, his Cable, his internet, his computer, his home, his vacations, all were more valuable than purchasing health coverage just in case he should fall ill.
And, even when he was feeling ill, he readily admits he would rather die that seek out treatment, which might incur expenses that would force him to forego his current lifestyle.
What is amazing is that he believes it reasonable that you and I should fund his coverage. Given what he is spending, his salon is likely barely breaking even each year, so, he is probably not paying any significant FICA, FICA-Med or income taxes. As a result, not only is he not financing his own coverage through taxation today, in seven years, his social security benefit is likely his only income in retirement, and we will be financing 100% of the cost of his health coverage as he will be a dual eligible … and likely qualify for supplemental security income as well.
It is equivalent to welfare .. for the rest of his life.
President Obama indicated he wanted to radically change America – looks like we are rapidly fulfilling his desires, even if those are not the priorities of those of us who pay taxes..
LikeLike
Right on Jack. No matter what it’s called, it is welfare. And you are also right about setting priorities in spending. I am convinced that alone is the major issue for the great middle class. They can’t set priorities, they can’t say no even to themselves and hence they cannot live within their means. We have lost the meaning of necessity, desire and luxury and why not, somewhere along the line you will be bailed out.
LikeLike