Everyone knows the IRC is a mess and that virtually no one understands it and that in many ways it simply is not fair. In addition, some provisions from dealing with health benefits to retirement work against individuals while other elements of the Code inhibit economic growth. So, why not fix it, simplify it? How hard can that be? Well, for one thing consider the millions of Americans who make a living off the current complexities from IRS employees; accountants, lawyers, software developers, tax preparers and most of all … politicians and those who lobby them.
There are powerful forces that like things as complicated as possible thank you very much, forces especially in Washington, DC, whose concern for the American people is far down the list below their own interests.
There is no logical reason not to have a greatly simplified tax code, none.
The Rand Paul plan is a place to start, but sadly we will likely focus on issues such as the paragraph below. Others will start yelling about cutting this or that program or some individuals not paying their fair share because the tax rate is not 90% on millionaires. That is all a ruse to maintain the status quo. Any politician who opposes greatly simplifying the IRC or who dwells on entitlement programs is working against you. You are being used and abused.
Mr. Paul said his plan, laid out on The Wall Street Journal’s opinion pages, would reduce the government’s tax take by over $2 trillion over 10 years, or at least 5%, based on congressional revenue estimates for 2016 to 2025. It would require substantial spending cuts to avoid adding to deficits—an amount roughly equal to all deficit reduction the federal government has done since 2010. -WSJ
Who knows if 14.5% is the right number? Perhaps we need a small VAT in addition, maybe the right number is 16.5%. That’s not important now. What is important is getting started and doing something that is headed in the right direction.
There are six things to focus on:
- The system is fair
- The system is simple
- The system preserves the social programs Americans want and are willing to pay for
- The system stimulates economic growth
- The system places the United States is a favorable global economic position
- The system gradually reduces the deficit and sustains a balance
All this is good, but nothing is going to happen, nothing unless the American people put pressure on all politicians and now is the time to start by putting pressure on each candidate for president.
You have two challenges; lobby for a simple, fair tax code and for term limits.
In the final analysis, it is up to you and it’s not all that complicated. Share this post with your friends, heck share it with your elected representatives— Do something, please‼️
Highlights of the Rand Paul plan (at least a place to start):
The plan would eliminate payroll taxes on workers, as well as gift and estate taxes and all duties and tariffs. His flat tax would apply to all personal income, including wages, salaries, dividends, capital gains, rents and interest. It would exempt the first $50,000 of income for a family of four.
The plan would eliminate many deductions but preserve two widely used ones, for mortgage interest and charitable contributions. One of the few targeted tax breaks it would retain is the earned-income tax credit, a wage supplement for lower-income working families.


It is amazing that 2 1/2 years have past and this still applies. While doing my 2017 taxes and trying to figure out how I will be taxed in 2018 under the new changes it occurred to me almost everybody should be able to file 1040-EZ forms. You basically do not have any deductions. Although this is not a flat tax at least it appears to be as fair as we can get due to almost no deductions.
LikeLike
Liberals have no clue about how a flat tax actually works.
LikeLike
By what means does Mr. Paul think he can get congress to agree to substantial cuts in the future when they won’t agree to them now?
LikeLike
.
What is the exemption for one person ?
Or is there any ?
If not…then my income taxes go straight through the roof… no thanks.
And a VAT tax too… just another tax that will never go away but only get higher and higher…
a VAT on top of state sales and property taxes that are already too high…. no thanks.
.
LikeLike
I would pay the same or less tax at 14.5%. If you would pay more than I would very, very, politely suggest that you are not currently paying your fair share of taxes or benefit from a lot of government tax code entitlements. Of course I don’t have the facts since not were provided. But I think if you would pay more under a flat tax then you make a great case why a flat tax would be unfair too. I thank you for pointing out that some people may end up paying more.
The success of a flat tax is that everyone pays the same with no exceptions. I would however like to offer one exception and that is maintain the tax defer 401K. With the lack of pensions I think people must save for their own retirement and be encouraged to do so. The taxman still can get his money on a 401K and all the capital gains when funds are withdrawn thus still getting his money. With a Roth as currently set up the taxman would not be able to tax the capital gains and lose out on tax money.
LikeLike