Early Decision – HumbleDollar – thoughts on filing for Social Security 

Early Decision James McGlynn  |  July 21, 2020

DELAYING SOCIAL Security until age 70 will get you the largest possible monthly benefit, and that’s the right strategy for many retirees. But what’s right for many folks won’t necessarily be right for you—and you may want to file at 62, the youngest possible age, so you maximize your total lifetime benefit.

If you’re single with no dependents, you should probably file at age 62 if you’re in poor health or your family doesn’t have great genes, and you don’t expect to live to age 80. Over this relatively short period, the smaller monthly benefit starting at age 62 will likely prove more valuable than waiting to get a larger monthly check.

Similarly, if you’re single and have no other income to live on, by all means start Social Security at 62. In both instances—poor health or no other income—beginning at 62 should be the right decision, provided you don’t live into your 80s.

If you’re widowed, there may also be good reason to begin Social Security at age 62. Survivor benefits can typically start at age 60 and won’t get any larger if you delay beyond your full Social Security retirement age, which will be 66 or 67, depending on the year you were born.

In some instances, a widow or widower might start her or his own benefit at age 62 and then switch over to survivor benefits at full retirement age, assuming the survivor benefit is bigger. Alternatively, those who are widowed might start survivor benefits at age 60 and then claim their own benefit—based on their own earnings history—at age 70, at which point it’ll be at its largest, thanks to the delay.

 Be sure to read the full article using the link below.

Source: Early Decision – HumbleDollar

One comment

  1. My wife (never worked outside the home) and I started SS at 62. We are now 65 and out of debt, saving thousands of dollars in interest payments to the banks. We have $10,000 in savings and it grows by $800 each month. This would not be possible if we would of waited to start SS. I have other retirement income, so starting SS at 62 was the right choice, since I was no longer working. We now live well below our income with both income sources getting colas when or if they are issued. If we live to age 85, starting SS at 62 will only cost us $50,000 in reduced benefits. Still our total SS benefit will be $368,000. Since I never made more than $25,000 during my working years waiting until FRA was never an option because the benefit was not that much larger.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s