Save ’Til It Hurts Richard Quinn | Dec 2, 2021, 1:03 pm ET
I FREQUENTLY FIND myself criticized when I state my fiscally conservative views on saving and spending in retirement. One fellow recently said I had no compassion and I was scaring people.
If folks are frightened by my urging them to retire with the ability to replace most of their preretirement income, then perhaps they should be scared.
I’m also criticized because I have a pension, and so don’t rely on investments for my income. As a result, I’m told, I don’t understand most people’s situation today. I do know what it means to make ends meet, however. My monthly pension in 2021 is the same as it was in 2010 when I retired, and that’ll never change.
Today, most workers are on their own, with no pension plan to count on. They need to accumulate a large pile of savings to generate their desired retirement income. To me, that’s even more reason to aim high, and preferably for 100% income replacement.
When I bring up the topic of income replacement, an underlying issue frequently pops up. Individuals want to retire in their 50s or early 60s. They conclude that, if my ideas are followed, they’ll have to work longer. Maybe that’s what’s scary to them.
I retired at 67. By working longer, I knew my pension would replace 100% of my base salary. If you retire at 55, the numbers are much harder. If you start with 70% income replacement and think it’ll get you through 30-plus years of retirement, you’re dreaming—unless, that is, your idea of a retirement lifestyle means significant changes, and not for the better.
There’s another area of confusion: expenses versus spending. They aren’t the same. People who create detailed retirement budgets based on their expenses are shortsighted. Expenses are what you need to live. Spending is how you want to live, and can include any number of extras—from travel to home remodeling to helping children and grandchildren.
Should the goal of retirement be just to cover the bare essentials? I understand the challenge of creating 100% income replacement. But remember, Social Security alone may get you 35% to 40% of the way there. Besides, what’s wrong with having some money left at the end of the month?
That extra cash could help you cope with an emergency, deal with high inflation or wait out a lengthy market downturn. And what about having extra money just for fun?
Read more by Richard Quinn
For some O/T isn’t worth it if it puts you into the next tax bracket or causes you to lose IRA/Roth eligibility.
LikeLike
I agree. I have been retired for 3 1/2 years. My husband just fully retired a year ago. Even now, we still try to put money in savings every month.
LikeLike
Exactly. We saved like crazy for 30+ years, and didn’t miss out on the essentials. People have to take responsibility for their future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are exactly CORRECT. Many young people do NOT save. They do not even work extra hours overtime when offered which could go towards extra savings. This next generation, I often wonder what they expect 30 years from now? It will only be worse, not better. Nothing gets better in the area of pensions, social security, and taxes.
LikeLiked by 1 person