Looking for the real tax cheats?

Many of our progressive minded politician like to beat the tax cheat drum usually aimed at the “wealthy,” whomever that may be. The IRS needs more money to go after theses cheats, right?

This is all political rhetoric designed to pit average Americans against their wealthier neighbors. When it comes to the super wealthy and corporations avoiding taxes or deferring them, look to the IRC and it’s immensely complicated regulations often subject to interpretation. The name of the game for every taxpayer is to avoid paying taxes you can possibly avoid. Sometimes you need lawyers to figure it all out – that’s what the wealthy and corporation do.

But it applies to everyone. How do you think we got 401k plans, cafeteria plans? Interpretation! Following is what Section 401k actually says (it continues for many more pages). Do you see anything about saving for retirement? Any chance of different interpretations?

Cash Or Deferred Arrangements

I.R.C. § 401(k)(1) General Rule — 

A profit-sharing or stock bonus plan, a pre-ERISA money purchase plan, or a rural cooperative plan shall not be considered as not satisfying the requirements of subsection (a)merely because the plan includes a qualified cash or deferred arrangement. 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2) Qualified Cash Or Deferred Arrangement — 

A qualified cash or deferred arrangement is any arrangement which is part of a profit-sharing or stock bonus plan, a pre-ERISA money purchase plan, or a rural cooperative plan which meets the requirements of subsection (a)— 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(A) — 

under which a covered employee may elect to have the employer make payments as contributions to a trust under the plan on behalf of the employee, or to the employee directly in cash; 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B) — 

under which amounts held by the trust which are attributable to employer contributions made pursuant to the employee’s election— 

Editor’s Note: Sec. 401(k)(2)(B)(i), below, before amendment by Pub. L. 117–328, Div. T, Sec. 334(b)(1), shall apply to distributions made on or before the date which is 3 years after the enactment of this Act [Enacted: Dec. 29, 2022].

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B)(i) — 

may not be distributable to participants or other beneficiaries earlier than— 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(I) — 

severance from employment, death, or disability, 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(II) — 

an event described in paragraph (10), 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(III) — 

in the case of a profit-sharing or stock bonus plan, the attainment of age 59 1/2, 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(IV) — 

subject to the provisions of paragraph (14), upon hardship of the employee, 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(V) — 

in the case of a qualified reservist distribution (as defined in section 72(t)(2)(G)(iii)), the date on which a period referred to in subclause (III) of such section begins, or 

I.R.C. § 401(k)(2)(B)(i)(VI) — 

except as may be otherwise provided by regulations, with respect to amounts invested in a lifetime income investment (as defined in subsection (a)(38)(B)(ii)), the date that is 90 days prior to the date that such lifetime income investment may no longer be held as an investment option under the arrangement.

IRC

So, who are the real tax cheats?

How People Cheat on Their Taxes

Most cheating is from deliberate—actual or willful—underreporting of income. This is called tax evasion—the most commonly charged tax crime. A government study found the most underreporting of income was by self-employed restaurateurs, clothing store owners, and—you’ll no doubt be shocked—car dealers. Telemarketers and salespeople came in next, followed by doctors, lawyers (heavens!), accountants (heavens, again!), and hairdressers.

Business owners who over-deduct business-related expenses—such as car and entertainment—came in a distant second on the cheaters hit parade. Surprisingly, the IRS contends that only 6.8% of deductions are overstated or just plain phony.

Tax Attorney Daily

8 comments

  1. My B.A. is in economics, but I recall rarely reading Adam Smith as a primary source. Most textbooks were secondary sources. As a result of recent discussions, I’ve looked at what he said about progressive taxation, and about wealth/income inequality.
    It doesn’t look good for the home team. Without external influence,* extreme wealth should be self limiting, and wages, especially at the bottom, should virtually automatically adjust to a sustainable, or even comfortable level. If not, it is incumbent on government to reduce the inequality, not just for “moral” reasons, but because a “less inequal” distribution is more efficient in increasing the wealth of the nation.

    *external influence as in successful businesses or individuals having a greater influence in laws and regulations, a self perpetuating spiral.

    Like

  2. Adam Smith argued that taxes should be proportional to how much a person benefits from living in society. There should be proportionality across levels of income and sources of income such as rent, profit, and wages.

    “It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.”

    (Sort of like, “You didn’t build that business by yourself…”)

    Like

  3. “Lowering your tax bill from many complicated structures is not clearly unlawful,” he said. “The IRS might win or lose in court,” or they might simply opt for a settlement somewhere in the middle.

    “Hiring more agents would help,” he added. But, “the solution to this avoidance at the top end is write better tax rules.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/03/26/wealthy-tax-evasion/

    ………………
    May be, may not be… That the greatest number of cheaters are at the lower level (and underreported 7 percent of income?) But the greatest dollar loss is from the top.

    “The richest Americans are hiding more than 20 percent of their earnings from the Internal Revenue Service, according to a comprehensive new estimate of tax evasion,* with the top 1 percent of earners accounting for more than a third of all unpaid federal taxes.

    That’s costing the federal government roughly $175 billion a year in revenue, according to the findings by a team of economists from academia and the IRS.*

    And may be Warren is not the best messenger. But there is little doubt that the income (and wealth) inequality has increased dramatically in the U.S. in my lifetime.

    *http://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/GLRRZ2021.pdf

    Like

    1. When you say hiding are you saying they outright cheat and avoid reporting or they are le raging the tax code in some manner? Exactly how does one hide income? And if this is known, why aren’t they in jail if it is evasion?

      Like

      1. Yes.

        But it’s not me saying it.

        E.g., “Investigating taxpayers who voluntarily declared hidden wealth or started reporting foreign bank accounts in 2009–2012 (amnesty) and who had been randomly audited just before, we find that in the vast majority of cases, the audits had failed to uncover offshore tax evasion.”

        Apparently there are such gray areas that it is hard to detect and even harder to prove. The researchers believe they are underestimating the evasion, but the cost of enforcement often exceeds the benefits.

        Like

  4. Taxation is theft. Government continues to tax and the taxed continue to recover using the clearly aforementioned tax codes.

    Like

      1. Some form of taxation is necessary to cover essential services, however, those taxes (and exceptions) need to be sent to the constituents for approval/rejection. The convoluted tax codes are mostly taxes handed down over the years. These are handed down not voted on. We all know from our Jersey experience that we “bought” our houses twice in 20 years when you consider the property taxes paid on those homes.
        Where I live now there is a separate property tax on vehicles. In that tax are elements for 911, school taxes, fire service and many other taxes that come to over $200. The registration tax is separate. None if these levies are sent to the tax payer to vote on.
        Taxes are approved by so called committees or boards and handed down to the payer.

        There are smarter people than me who could write simple tax reforms.

        Do we know where all those covid dollars went? Have they been spent for what they were designated? Are monies left over?

        Now we are being taxed to handle all the illegal migrants.

        Thank you for the opportunity to share thoughts on this complex issue.

        Like

Leave a reply to rdquinn Cancel reply