A warning from the past – the founding fathers anticipated Trump and the susceptibility of the people

The al­le­ga­tions in the in­dict­ment of Don­ald Trump for con­spir­ing to over­turn the elec­tion of 2020 rep­re­sent the Amer­ican Founders’ night­mare.

A key con­cern of James Madi­son and Alexan­der Hamil­ton was that dem­agogues would in­cite mobs and fac­tions to defy the rule of law, over­turn free and fair elec­tions and un­der­mine Amer­i­can democracy. “The only path to a sub­ver­sion of the re­pub­li­can system f the Coun­try is, by flattering the prej­u­dices of the people , and ex­citing their jeal­ousies and ap­pre­hensions, to throw affairs into con­fu­sion, and bring on civil com­mo­tion,” Alexan­der Hamilton wrote in 1790. “When a man un­prin­ci­pled in pri­vate life, des­per­ate in his for­tune, bold in his tem­per…is seen to mount the hobby horse of pop­ular­ity,” Hamil­ton warned, “he may ‘ride the storm and di­rect the whirl-wind.’”

And norms about the peace­ful trans­fer of power, strength­ened by George Wash­ing­ton’s tow­er­ing ex­am­ple of vol­un­tar­ily step­ping down from of­fice af­ter two terms, would en­sure that no elected pres­i­dent could con­vert him­self, like Cae­sar, into an unelected dic­ta­tor. “The idea of in­tro­duc­ing a monar­chy or aris­toc­racy into this Coun­try,” Hamil-pton wrote, “is one of those vi­sion­ary things, that none but mad­men could med­i­tate,” as long as the Amer­i­can peo­ple resisted “con­vul­sions and dis­orders in con­se­quence of the acts of pop­u­lar dem­agogues.”

Excerpt from Essay, The Founders Anticipated the Threat of Trump, the Wall Street Journal August 4, 2023

“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist.”
– Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism

13 comments

  1. Dick you haven’t commented on the facts that many eminent Legal Scholars have opined that the the indictments are weak and may very well be unconstitutional.
    There are reasonable people who believe that disagreement with the election results is protected speech: see Hillary, Al Gore, et. al. As example of public disagreement

    Like

    1. I haven’t and the reason being that as I read about it all I find just as many so-called experts saying the case presented is strong in many ways. I think the actions being alleged go far beyond disagreement with election results. It’s actions to overturn the results – illegally that is alleged. I can find no one in history going to the lengths Trump has and is going. His protesting of his innocence, his name calling and general behavior is highly suspicious IMO. Read his hourly posts on Truth Social and I think you will see what I mean. He is setting up for a possible loss in 2024.

      Like

  2. You have made clear your opinion of Trump’s character and what you think he was attempting to do on January 6th.

    My question is why you never comment on Biden’s character? He has been lying, plagiarizing and embellishing his accomplishments and life events for years. It is now coming to light that he and his family have become rich by using his position and influence in “business dealings “ with China and Russia.

    This is who you want leading our country?

    Like

    1. Allegedly.
      I voted for Biden, and likely will again, but my vote, like many others, was more against Trump than for Biden. Lesser of two evils, by far. Biden is a more or less typical politician, and the world is a better place having had him.
      Trump should have been in prison two years ago. (Or more)

      Like

      1. Well said! Trump is literally an existential threat to our country, both through his corruption or his incompetence. Even if the allegations about Biden’s son turn out to be true, there is nothing close to moral equivalence with Trump. Not to mention, Biden has actually had a fairly effective and competent administration during a time of significant turmoil. That said, if the Republicans ran a center right, fiscally conservative Republican, like Romney or McCain, they would probably win easily against Biden. Unfortunately there is little chance such a candidate could ever get through the primary at this point, due to the populist turn that the Republican Party has taken.

        Like

      2. 1. Don’t sugarcoat it. Trump is literally a threat to the World.

        2. If/when Trump is gone, the threat is not. There are still millions of Americans disenfranchised/disillusioned, looking for a change.

        3. And more co-conspirators ready to use them.

        Like

    2. Thank you dvk6459. Notice Mr. Quinn never answers this question. Unfortunately the current administration has accomplished manipulating the main stream media and intimidating anyone going against their ‘perception’. I applaude you.

      Like

      1. I don’t think about Biden at all. I didn’t and won’t vote for him, but that is quite irrelevant. The issue is the character, personality and goals of Donald Trump. In that regard he is dangerous to put it simply. Don’t take my opinion. Follow his every word, what he writes on his own TruthSocial. Then tell me that is the kind of person you want leading us. Indeed, see if he is the kind of person you would raise your children to be.

        Like

  3. It is amazing how prescient the Founding Fathers were, with their language almost describing the Trump phenomenon perfectly. And it is because of people who can no longer distinguish between truth and falsehoods, or no longer care to.

    “The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the convinced
    Communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist.”
    – Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism
    SHARE

    Like

Leave a reply to rdquinn Cancel reply