Of Course Nobody and Certainly no Politician Want to Pay for Spending

Paying for Emergency Funding

November 3, 2023

Read the analysis.

As Congress considers $14 billion of emergency funding to aid Israel and potentially tens of billions more in other one-time foreign and domestic supplemental funding packages, lawmakers should work to offset the costs. The key purpose of offsets is to prevent legislation from adding to the debt. The proposed rescission of IRS funding to pay for aid to Israel is not an effective offset, as it would reduce revenue collections and thus lead to $27 billion of total borrowing, rather than $14 billion. 

Below we suggest a number of possible payfors for a hypothetical $100 billion emergency spending package over four years (the time in which almost all of the emergency spending would be spent out). 

Possible offsets of roughly $100 billion over four years include:

  • Rescind President Biden’s unilateral Income-Driven Repayment program expansion. 
  • End the individual and business state and local tax (SALT) deduction through the end of 2025. 
  • Phase out Medicare Advantage overpayments due to coding intensity and phase in budget neutral quality bonuses. 
  • Reform Medicare provider payments to address site-of-service disparities and reduce excess post-acute care payments, and end reimbursements for bad debts. 
  • Impose a temporary 2.5 percent corporate surtax. 
  • Impose a temporary 0.25 percent “offset surtax” on top of current income tax rates. 
  • Establish a temporary $10 per barrel oil surtax. 
  • Reduce the 2024 update by 1 percent for all inflation-indexed federal government programs and provisions. 
  • Reduce the Fiscal Responsibility Act-enacted Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 and FY 2024 discretionary spending caps by 3 percent. 
  • Impose a 0.5 percent across-the-board spending cut on nearly all mandatory and discretionary spending programs.

Most of these offsets could be adjusted upward or downward depending on the size of the emergency package and the timeframe of the offsets. Lawmakers could also consider multiple smaller options as payfors.

But with $2 trillion annual deficits, policymakers need to start taking the federal debt much more seriously. That starts with paying for new initiatives.

Read the analysis.

Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

3 comments

  1. CBO 10-year projections can be very inaccurate as was proven with Obama Care and what they projected. So when they tell me the IRS needs more money and if hey have it we can expect XYZ amount of dollars I scratch my head in wonderment. Who can make accurate 10-year forecasts? Who could have predicted 9/11–the 2008 implosion and recession (10%+ unemployment)–quantitative easing–COVID–wars in Ukraine and Middle East which have an effect on spending and revenue.

    Can you predict what your next ten years will look like financially–health wise–the “market”–technology–world events? Anything other than you will be 10-years older and closer to death.

    Let’s not forget why we have this IRS issue–Biden and friends wanted to spend lots of money–called it the Inflation Reduction Act and had to offset spending with revenue–one way to fill in a blank was to hire IRS agents and tell us they would only target the rich who don’t pay their fair share (hey, isn’t his son one of those tax cheats?–never even filed for a few years)–just like that they can project revenue–need even more revenue well hire 95,000 agents.

    You know in June to keep the govt. open the Biden administration and Congress adjusted the IRS agent/revenue situation, so they have done this once.

    What to have fun? Go to your Google machine and ask what % of taxes do the top 10% of earners pay? Top 5%–top 25%. The numbers are from the Treasury.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Al Lindquist Cancel reply