Financial literacy proficiency is kaput

I wrote this article nearly six years ago for HumbleDollar.com. It seems not much has changed. In 2018 I said “A bailout would seem to be in order. But who’s going to do the bailing?Now we know the answer🤑

Clueless

Richard Quinn  |  Nov 13, 2018

I WAS RECENTLY looking at one of those “whatever happened to” top 10 lists. In this case, it was about a select group of celebrities and their money—or lack thereof. The point of the list: All of these people, who had made millions, were broke or worse. Several had filed for bankruptcy more than once. Others were deep in debt and most owed hundreds of thousands to the IRS. One former star, who once earned several million dollars a year, had $5,000 in the bank.

The good life

How does that happen? I guess their celebrity status was no guarantee they’d be smart or act responsibly. In some cases, they were duped into poor investments. But the overriding cause of their woes was out-of-control spending, living lavishly during the peak of their stardom with little regard for the future.

Why should we care about these folks? They provide a good learning experience for us mortals, and especially young people who idolize these celebrities and their lifestyles.

Overspending, ignoring future financial needs and not learning to manage money are common failures for many Americans. But why are we surprised? Formal financial education is very limited.

The Council for Economic Education reports that only 17 states require high school students to take a course in personal finance and only 22 require they take a course in economics. Studies have found that, without financial education, students are more likely to end up with low credit scores and other financial problems.

I also question the effectiveness of the formal education that is offered. In an admittedly unscientific study, I recently asked a few teenagers, who had taken high school financial education classes, some basic money questions. They were clueless. To be fair, we’re talking teenagers here, so they were probably distracted by their phones.

But what about adults? Participants in FINRA’s National Financial Capability Study were asked five questions covering relatively common financial issues, such as compoundinginflationdiversificationmortgages, and bond prices and interest rates. The results weren’t encouraging: 63% of participants got three or fewer questions correct.

The evidence overwhelming indicates all too many people aren’t adequately preparing for their future retirement. One study suggests at least 50% of Americans will see their standard of living drop once they retire. Dealing with the present seems beyond the ability of many, so maybe we shouldn’t be surprised they also struggle to save for the future.

Where does all this leave us? We have a population that’s poorly educated in financial and economic matters, older workers who are ill-prepared for retirement, a younger generation saddled with student loans and finding it difficult to control their spending, and a retired generation calling for higher Social Security benefits.

A bailout would seem to be in order. But who’s going to do the bailing?

4 comments

  1. The column is accurate and the comments are accurate. There is nothing new about this. The majority of the populace is innumerate and it is of small value to teach personal finance to high school kids, it is an abstraction to them as is the other academic subjects.
    The difficulty in expecting the whole population to save for retirement is that too many people don’t have the ability to save. Their income is too low. You can say they could at least save something but something isn’t enough and you can run the calculator out 30 years with 8% or whatever and say they would have a pot of cash if they only saved 5 dollars a week. My own investing went up and down, not smoothly up as the calculator would have it.
    One last thought. If people are marginally living while working or living off the fat of the land instead of working, isn’t it true that will be their condition right up till the end. If so, why be so worried that they aren’t saving for some future that won’t be any different than how they live now.

    Like

  2. People have been intentionally coddled by expecting government at all levels to subsidize their living expenses. After all, it’s their right to have free medical service, it’s their right to have free childcare, it’s their right to be free of student debt, it’s their right to have care free retirement money worries, it’s their right to have etc. etc.!

    Responsible money management and spending by too many people has long since been cast aside. Mandating that government cover living expenses for too many people is frankly a bottomless money pit.

    Like

  3. so, what else is new–we know the issues and not much will change–Paul is 100% correct that tax, spend, and borrow is what we can expect and have done–this is the season of making promises and when you promise to transfer student loans to working folks, arbitrarily select a price for drugs, no taxing for tips–all these goodies to buy votes so the debt is governmental and personal.

    folks are poorly educated about so many things so why would finance not be included–we use our schools to indoctrinate our students with social justice–DEI–drag queens in libraries–and other non-educational areas–teach the basics and finance should be an elective or part of an economics course.

    what’s changed since the article was published??

    Like

Leave a reply to AL LINDQUIST Cancel reply