What Would the Trump Campaign Plans Mean for Social Security?

Pay attention‼️

OCT 21, 2024 

US BUDGET WATCH 2024

SOCIAL SECURITY

The Social Security trust funds will be insolvent by Fiscal Year (FY) 2034, according to projections by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), at which point the law calls for a 23 percent cut in benefits.1 Restoring solvency over the next 75 years would require the equivalent of reducing all future benefits by 24 percent or increasing revenue by 35 percent.

Vice President Kamala Harris has said she would “protect Social Security” and former President Donald Trump has said he would “fight for and protect Social Security.” Unfortunately, neither candidate has presented plans to fix Social Security’s finances despite the looming $16,500 cut facing a typical couple retiring just before insolvency.

In fact, we find President Trump’s campaign proposals would dramatically worsen Social Security’s finances.2

President Trump’s proposals to eliminate taxation of Social Security benefits, end taxes on tips and overtimeimpose tariffs, and expand deportations would all widen Social Security’s cash deficits. Under our central estimate, we find that President Trump’s agenda would:

  • Increase Social Security’s ten-year cash shortfall by $2.3 trillion through FY 2035.
  • Advance insolvency by three years, from FY 2034 to FY 2031 – hastening the next President’s insolvency timeline by one-third.
  • Lead to a 33 percent across-the-board benefit cut in 2035, up from the 23 percent CBO projects under current law.
  • Increase Social Security’s annual shortfall by roughly 50 percent in FY 2035, from 3.6 to 4 percent of payroll.
  • Require the equivalent of reducing current law benefits by about one-third or increasing revenue by about one-half to restore 75-year solvency.

Source: Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

2 comments

  1. best reason to get this out of the hands of the politicians–for our grandkids transition to a TSP contribution from participant and employer–like TSP, you die and the benefit goes to an heir–

    the Galveston Plan has worked for decades and its framework could be considered–of course our friends on the left hate any mention of changing the system as they love the power they yield.

    Like

  2. A lot depends upon who controls the majority in the two houses of Congress, especially the House of Representatives which is entrusted by the Constitution to initiate taxation and spending proposals. Yes, yes…I Know Biden has issued executive orders bypassing the Constitution. And Harris and her crowd will do the same. Trump and the fiscally conservative Republicans I doubt it.

    Like

Leave a reply to alindq99d11894a3 Cancel reply