How do you feel about federal government spending?

I took the test on the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget site to see my philosophy on spending. Here is what the results showed.

I’m a futurist and I agree with that.

The best is yet to come

The Futurist believes in planning and spending for the future in a sustainable way. Futurists believe in making investments in research, infrastructure, climate change, or spending on children to ensure they grow up healthy and educated.

While a strong federal government is needed to encourage investment and spending on children, Futurists believe that spending programs should be paid for with enough tax revenue to cover their cost so later generations do not inherit an unsustainable level of federal debt.

When federal debt becomes a problem.

The level of federal debt is a significant and growing risk for the United States economy. Here’s a breakdown of why:   

Current Situation:

  • As of March 6, 2025, the U.S. federal government debt stands at approximately $36.56 trillion.   
  • The debt-to-GDP ratio, a key indicator of the country’s ability to manage its debt, was around 122-124% as of December 2024. This level is exceptionally high, exceeding the peak seen after World War II.
  • The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that under current laws, federal debt held by the public will rise from 99% of GDP in 2024 to 116% in 2034 and potentially 172% in 2054.

Why is this level of debt a risk?

  • Increased Interest Costs: As the debt grows, the government spends more on interest payments. In fiscal year 2024, net interest costs were $881 billion, and they are projected to rise to $1.8 trillion by 2035. This increasing expenditure can crowd out crucial public investments in areas like education, infrastructure, and research and development, hindering economic growth.   
  • Risk of Fiscal Crisis: A high debt level can make investors lose confidence in the U.S. government’s ability to repay its obligations. This could lead to a fiscal crisis characterized by a sudden and sharp increase in interest rates and a decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, potentially triggering a global financial crisis.   
  • Inflationary Pressures: Elevated federal debt can increase the risk of inflation. Persistent deficits can boost aggregate demand, and if the Federal Reserve reacts by raising interest rates, it increases borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. Some economic models suggest that a permanent increase in the deficit could lead to a significant loss in household purchasing power over time.
  • Reduced Economic Growth: Many studies suggest a negative correlation between high debt levels and economic growth. Increased government borrowing can lead to higher interest rates, crowding out private investment in business equipment and structures. This can stifle innovation, slow productivity growth, and lead to stagnant wages.
  • Burden on Future Generations: Current borrowing is often financing current consumption, which benefits the present generation but places a greater financial burden on future generations through higher taxes or reduced government services. Rising debt as a share of GDP means that future living standards could be lower than they would otherwise be.
  • Limited Flexibility to Respond to Crises: A high debt level leaves policymakers with less flexibility to respond effectively to unexpected economic downturns, national security threats, or health crises. The ability to implement fiscal stimulus or provide necessary relief may be constrained.
  • Challenges to National Security: Some experts argue that high national debt can be a national security risk by making the U.S. more dependent on foreign creditors and limiting resources available for defense and security investments.
  • Jeopardizing Social Programs: If the government lacks sufficient resources due to high debt and interest payments, essential social safety net programs like Social Security and Medicare could be put at risk.

It’s important to note that:

  • There is no specific debt-to-GDP ratio that automatically triggers a crisis. The risk depends on various factors, including investor confidence, economic growth prospects, and the government’s fiscal management.
  • Historically, debt levels have risen during wars and recessions but then declined. However, the current trajectory shows a sustained increase even during periods without major crises.

In conclusion, while the U.S. has historically managed high debt levels, the current and projected levels pose significant risks to the nation’s economic stability, growth potential, and the well-being of future generations. Addressing the structural imbalance between spending and revenue will be crucial to mitigating these risks.

From a variety of private and public sources

9 comments

  1. The other obvious way to identify the Golden Era of American Education is to look at the high point of student achievement. This is harder, if not impossible, to game — but there are issues here, too, especially with scores for 17-year-olds/12th graders. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress’s Long Term Trends series, scores for 17-year-olds peaked in the late 1980s or early 1990s in reading and in 1999 in math. Meanwhile, on the main NAEP, which has been adjusted over the decades to better align with curricular changes but goes back only to the early 1990s, 12th graders hit their peak in 1992 in reading (the math trend goes back only to 2005, so it isn’t much use)

    Like

  2. The other obvious way to identify the Golden Era of American Education is to look at the high point of student achievement. This is harder, if not impossible, to game — but there are issues here, too, especially with scores for 17-year-olds/12th graders. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress’s Long Term Trends series, scores for 17-year-olds peaked in the late 1980s or early 1990s in reading and in 1999 in math. Meanwhile, on the main NAEP, which has been adjusted over the decades to better align with curricular changes but goes back only to the early 1990s, 12th graders hit their peak in 1992 in reading (the math trend goes back only to 2005, so it isn’t much use)

    Like

  3. performance not consistent with spend.

    “… The other obvious way to identify the Golden Era of American Education is to look at the high point of student achievement. This is harder, if not impossible, to game — but there are issues here, too, especially with scores for 17-year-olds/12th graders. According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress’s Long Term Trends series, scores for 17-year-olds peaked in the late 1980s or early 1990s in reading and in 1999 in math. Meanwhile, on the main NAEP, which has been adjusted over the decades to better align with curricular changes but goes back only to the early 1990s, 12th graders hit their peak in 1992 in reading (the math trend goes back only to 2005, so it isn’t much use).”

    Like

  4. Al Lindquist

    Our problem is that we spend too much–what has changed in the past 8-months? We just shift the spending around–debt interest is more than defense spending–any attempt to deal with entitlement spending will be met with criticism from one group or another.

    We are swimming in revenue with 4% unemployment but folks just love to spend. “We need a strong federal government to support spending on children.” Over the past 25-years we probably have spent billions on children–what has worked? What has gotten better? And what have we spent it on–the lefties always use children as their method of convincing folks that we need to spend even more money.

    Aren’t kids fatter and less well educated then 25-years ago? What happened ?

    Stop spending so much money and we might have a chance to turn things around.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. We all know the debt is a problem and we know it is growing. Where the problem lies is the disagreement about what spending to cut and what taxes to raise in order to get annual deficits under control.

    Like

      1. Jack, thanks for this article. I knew spending was bigger now than in the past but not that much. I marvel at the high schools now that look like college campuses. The grandkids have chrome books and all sorts of activities at school but I can’t see that they know anything more than I learned at their grade level and I had virtually nothing but books, pencil and paper.

        Like

Leave a reply to BenefitJack Cancel reply