As you can see, Alberto is a robot, a pretty unique robot who works in a restaurant. Actually there are two Albertos.
One Alberto delivers your order to your table. Your table number is entered in the kitchen. A server places the food on the table.
Alberto says “Please enjoy your meal”
Alberto II assists the server who places the dirty dishes in Alberto and tells him to return to the kitchen.

According to our server, our automated friend replaced two employees.
Take this to the next level and all servers will be a memory.


Of course, just as bad are some of the state debacles, such as this one in California.
There was a “jaw-dropping” amount of fraud in the Employment Development Department (EDD). Originally thought to be “only” $11 billion in “improper” payments, we now know that the fraud exceeded $31 billion. To put that in perspective, that is 10% of the entire budget for the state of California. More insulting is where the money went. Transnational organized criminal groups from China and Africa have made off with billions of dollars, with who knows how much of it used for child trafficking, drugs, and terrorism.
From wikipedia, CA Employment Development Department: “… In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the system of unemployment benefits was expanded in such a way that it enabled self-employed people to get weekly checks. Few safeguards were in place to prevent ineligible people from getting these checks. This led to massive fraud, reaching around $20 billion, “perhaps the largest fraud wave in history”. See: Adam Beam (October 25, 2021). “California’s unemployment fraud reaches at least $20 billion”. Los Angeles Times. Jay Barmann (October 26, 2021). “Total Scope of California’s Unemployment Check Fraud Was Around $20 Billion”. SFist. 2/9/22; Cezary Podkul (July 26, 2021). “How Unemployment Insurance Fraud Exploded During the Pandemic”. ProPublica.
And, from wikipedia, Julie Su: “… Su’s nomination faced challenges on both sides of the aisle, due to the reluctance of Senator Joe Manchin to support her, as well as Republican criticism of her handling of COVID unemployment relief funding in California, wherein an estimated $32 billion meant to safeguard unemployed Californians during the pandemic ended up being paid out fraudulently. She also faced criticism for attempting to use her position as Acting Secretary of Labor to forgive $29 billion of the federal Covid loans California received prior to the fraud. The confirmation process stalled in the Senate due to a lack of votes necessary for confirmation. …”
How much waste, fraud and abuse do you need to see?
LikeLike
I agree with your logical conclusion, but I do see the need for some employees to do some work. So, by extension, who will be motivated to actually do work? For instance will anyone be there to fix Alberto when he breaks? How will people distinguish themselves to become entrepreneurial? Interesting line of reasoning for sure.
LikeLike
“The conventional viewpoint says we need a jobs program and we need to cut welfare. Just the opposite! We need more welfare and fewer jobs. Jobs for every American is doomed to failure because of modern automation and production. We ought to recognize it and create an income-maintenance system so every single American has the dignity and the wherewithal for shelter, basic food, and medical care. I’m talking about welfare for all. Without it, you’re going to have warfare for all.”
“The problem isn’t even a problem. Automation and technology would be a great boon if it were creative, if there were more leisure, more opportunity to engage in raising a family, providing guidance to the young, all the stuff we say we need. America will work if we’re all in it together. It’ll work when there’s a shared sense of destiny. It can be done! It’s all there!”
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2010/06/10/jerry-brown-flashback-we-need-more-welfare-and-fewer-jobs/
LikeLike
We DO have a shared sense of destiny – it is why America and Americans are what we are. America wasn’t built by “sharing” assets, but by deploying capital and encouraging productivity.
Compare America in the 21st Century with Europe – and its income maintenance/entitlement economy. The European Union is what results from “income maintenance.” According to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund:
America, employment, productive effort, is our shared destiny. It is why everyone want to come here, and why many of those who come here want to become Americans (not just geographically, but in spirit).
Unemployment compensation or “income maintenance”, has always been intended to be temporary, between jobs. Else it becomes “early retirement”. That is a necessity in an economy where “creative destruction” is the norm, AND essential. However, unemployment compensation must first be earned (by paying taxes).
David J. Price and Jae Song investigated the long-term effect of cash assistance for beneficiaries and their children by following up, after four decades, with participants in the Seattle-Denver Income Maintenance Experiment. Treated families in this randomized experiment received thousands of dollars per year in extra government benefits for three or five years in the 1970s. Using administrative data from the Social Security Administration and the Washington State Department of Health, they found the added transfers caused adults to earn an average of $1,800 less per year after the experiment ended. Today, indefinite “income maintenance” makes no sense at the macro, or economy-wide level, due to immigration, politics, and the impact on work ethic.
Myself, I am not a slave to America, earning wages and paying taxes so other Americans can share in my efforts. I’ve been employed all but a few months of the past 55 years and remain employed today. President Obama might say “you didn’t build that”, trying to give others credit for my productive efforts. It’s true, I didn’t build everything I benefit from, but that argument only goes so far. I may not have built the road or the bridge I take to work everyday, but, my taxes and yours certainly did. So, yes, just like the architect and the bank and its depositors may not have actually built that building, they all contributed, in their own way. And, in terms of the defense of America, only a small percentage of mostly male Americans have donned the uniform emblazoned with a flag. One of my few regrets in life, 50+ years later, is that I wasn’t a better soldier.
Even though some of us served, all of us, you, I, all of us must pay taxes to provide for the general defense and “welfare” – but that is how “welfare” is earned and protected.
Our most significant fiscal challenges result from “entitlements” – Congress’ believes that because you are an American (and certain specified lawfully resident aliens), you should be entitled to certain items – including, for some, taxpayer subsidized health care coverage. That belief is the prime reason why America added $25+ Trillion in debt after President Obama signed Health Reform into law. It is the prime reason why we continue to spend $2 Trillion more each year than we are willing to tax – sending the bill to Americans too young to vote and generations yet unborn. And, it is not as if general revenues to the federal government haven’t increased nearly 200% over the past 25 years (now almost 300% of what they were at the turn of the Century).
And, you want to do what, create a new trust fund for income maintenance, further increase the deficit, speeding up while careening even further into debt, perhaps to crack-up coincident with the projected 2033 exhaustion of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds? Why would you create disincentives to work when we are running $2 Trillion in annual deficits, are $37 Trillion in debt, with Social Security and Medicare trust fund exhaustion anticipated in just 8 years?
We need more work, more income, more taxes as the status quo is not sustainable indefinitely!
LikeLike
A businessman was at the pier of a Mexican coastal village when a small boat with a single fisherman docked. Inside the small boat were several large, high quality tuna. The businessman complimented the fisherman on the fish and asked how long it took to catch them.
“Only a little while,” replied the fisherman.
The businessman then asked why he didn’t stay out longer and catch more fish. The fisherman said he had enough to support his family’s needs.
“But what do you do with the rest of your time?” asked the businessman.
“I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, take a siesta with my wife, then stroll into the village each evening, where I sip wine and play guitar with my amigos,” the fisherman replied. “I have a full and busy life.”
The businessman scoffed.
“Listen, I can help you,” the businessman said. “You should spend more time fishing—with the money you earn, you could buy a bigger boat. Then, several boats. Eventually you’d have a whole fleet!”
“Instead of selling your catch to a middleman, you could sell directly to the processor and eventually open your own cannery. You could move to Mexico City, or L.A., or New York, where you would run your global enterprise.”
“But, how long will this all take?” the fisherman asked.
“About 15 to 20 years,” replied the businessman.
“And what then?” asked the fisherman.
The businessman laughed.
“That’s the best part!” he said. “When the time is right you would announce an IPO and sell your company stock to the public and become very rich. You’d make millions.”
“Millions? Then what?” inquired the fisherman.
“Then you’d retire. Move to a small fishing village where you could sleep late, fish a little, play with your kids, take a siesta with your wife, and stroll to the village in the evenings, where you could sip wine and play your guitar with your amigos.”
The fisherman just smiled.
“Thank you for your advice.”…
Have you thought about how much garbage you generate every day? Economists have looked at the data and it turns out that higher-income countries like the United States, Denmark, and New Zealand generate at least twice as much waste per capita than developing countries.
https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2020/01/31/waste-woes-in-the-world…
“Rich countries use six times more resources, generate 10 times the climate impacts than low-income ones.”
https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/rich-countries-use-six-times-more-resources-generate-10-times…
Thank you for your advice.
LikeLike
No problem if you want to go to Mexico, fish a little each day to meet your needs, and use the leisure time as you see fit.
However, if you are like the fisherman in your story, at some point, even if you successfully fish every day for the rest of your life, you and/or the wife will need medical care. You need police and national defense, so that no one steals your catch everyday. If you have kids, they may not want fish everyday, so you also need education. But, since you plan to live in the underground economy and fish only for what you need each day, you’re not paying taxes – even though you need protection, social services, defense, police.
Keep in mind also that Mexicans have been free riding on America’s very costly health care systems and innovations, where, in part, it has resulted in improved life expectancy from about 48 years to 76 years over the past 75 years. (For comparison, American life expectancy increased from 68 to 79 over that same 75 year time period).
I am very happy that you, me, every American can make choices. That occurs because Americans can and should pay taxes for the national defense and the general welfare (which enables each to make their own choices).
Just don’t tax you, me or others more than what is needed, while minimizing free riding, as a means to fund “income maintenance” for others’ lifestyle choices.
LikeLike
Al Lindquist
great story–just think of the jobs created by the fisherman if he expanded and grew–think of the jobs created by all the companies we use every day–best “welfare” program is one that created jobs that support our vibrant economy –the lazy fisherman has a right to be lazy but of course he/she lives off the rest of us.
LikeLike
It’s just a parable. I haven’t seen many (any?) articles or papers on wasteful (public or private) spending. The article on waste of resources and environmental damage are interesting, though. Are we better off than most other countries with a lower ‘standard of living’? Is it worth the wasted resources?
Anyone?
LikeLike
“… I haven’t seen many (any?) articles or papers on wasteful (public or private) spending. …”
You are joking, right? Here are a few…
The 2024 Festivus Report and additional research have exposed shocking uses of taxpayer dollars, showcasing absurd and unnecessary spending across federal programs. Here are 50 of the most egregious examples:
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(Newsweek)
(Newsweek)
(HSGAC Report)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(Washington Examiner)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(HSGAC Report)
(NY Post)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(Washington Examiner)
(NY Post)
(NY Post)
(Washington Examiner)
(NY Post)
(Washington Examiner)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(NY Post)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(NY Post)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(NY Post)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
(HSGAC Report)
LikeLike