House Build Back Better Bills Are Built on Shaky Foundation

Claims that all the massive new spending will not add to federal debt are not true. Raising the SALT deduction benefits higher income and the wealthy. The exact group that progressive Democrats say don’t pay their fair share – politics in action.

November 5, 2021


The House is slated to vote today on two parts of the President’s Build Back Better agenda – the bipartisan infrastructure bill and a reconciliation bill addressing climate change, child care, health care, and other priorities.

The following is a statement from Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget:

A fiscally responsible Build Back Better agenda should be fully paid for, gimmick-free, well-targeted based on the country’s needs, and enacted in the context of a broader budget. While policymakers should be commended for their efforts to scale back costs and include real offsets, these bills still fall far short of those goals.

While President Biden and Members of Congress pledged their agenda would not add to the debt, it is likely that both bills would increase the deficit based on official estimates. The bipartisan infrastructure bill – negotiated by Democrats and Republicans – will add roughly $400 billion to the debt over the next decade. While we still don’t know the true fiscal impact of the reconciliation legislation, it is likely that it will add modestly to the deficit as well.* No one should vote for this bill prior to seeing a CBO score.

The bills are also riddled with gimmicks. The bipartisan infrastructure bill claims it is fully paid for by taking credit for savings that had nothing to do with the bill itself. The reconciliation bill keeps its official cost down through arbitrary expirations – the Child Tax Credit and Earned Income Tax Credit expansions after one year, Affordable Care Act expansions after 3 and 4 years, and child care and pre-K after six years. If these and other sunset policies are extended without offsets, it would cost an additional $2 to $2.5 trillion through the end of the decade.

And then there’s the last-minute addition of a SALT cap increase, which will deliver a huge tax cut to very high earners at a cost of nearly $300 billion over the first five years. The proposed SALT cap increase would cost more than the bill’s Child Tax Credit, health coverage expansions, housing initiatives, or education funding, and roughly 98 percent of the benefit would go to those making six figures. This is egregious in light of the objectives of the bill. This tax cut would be offset on paper with a sleight of hand where policymakers extend the SALT cap beyond 2026 but leave other accompanying parts of the TCJA for future lawmakers to extend.

All of this is being considered in the context of near-record levels of debt, trust funds years away from insolvency, and an unsustainable fiscal situation that few in either party are even trying to address. Given the current budget outlook, we should ideally be pursuing long-term deficit reduction, rather than limiting deficit increases. And we should be doing it in the context of an actual detailed budget for the nation.

Washington’s credibility is on the line, and we need to get this right. Rather than rush through irresponsible legislation before it has even been scored, the House should fix the flaws in the current bills to ensure the Build Back Better agenda –both reconciliation and infrastructure – is honestly accounted for and truly paid for.
*The Administration estimates the current bill would reduce deficits by $36 billion. However, its $480 billion estimate of gross revenue raised from higher IRS funding is likely more than twice as high as what CBO will conclude.

For more information, please contact Kim McIntyre, director of media relations, at mcintyre@crfb.org

4 comments

  1. Enron bankruptcy happened 20 years ago next month and I just re-watched a show on it. Enron used accounting tricks of booking FUTURE profits at the time of signing deals. What Congress is saying is that the costs will come down by FUTURE savings. Sounds too similar to me. Nothing good can come out of it.

    Like

  2. Thank you for sharing this incredible shell game. No one in their right mind would run a household using these budget scams.

    Make a positive difference in someone’s life today. Bill Mitchell
    ________________________________

    Like

  3. Why is it the taxpayers never get to know what is exactly in these bills? I do not understand the President saying it will not cost taxpayers a dime. What a joke? We always have to pay for the junk they put inside the middle of these so call bills. I’m a sick and tired of being lied too.
    Why can’t the citizens have a right to review and vote on these ridiculous expensive bills? Then maybe Congress will not be able to put those extras inside all these bills. Yes! If you believe the millionaires and billionaires are going to pay for this i have a bridge in Brooklyn that’s for sale. Just my opinion.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s