THE FEDERAL government’s Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services just announced the new income-based Part B and Part D premiums for 2022. Many people aren’t happy.

Next year’s basic Part B premium jumps to $170.10 a month, in part because Congress artificially limited this year’s premium increase to only 25% of the true amount. It’s time to play catchup—and deal with rising health care costs.

But a small group of seniors will pay more than $170.10 a month—sometimes much more. At issue is IRMAA, short for income-related monthly adjustment amount, the Medicare premium surcharges for higher-income retirees. In 2022, these surcharges start at a modified adjusted gross income of $91,000 for single individuals and $182,000 for couples.

Like most people, I don’t like paying more than I have to for anything. But let’s be realistic: The median household income for Americans ages 65 to 74 is $46,360 and, for those over age 74, it’s $54,058. For a couple to pay IRMAA premiums in 2022, they need an income that’s more than three times these medians.

I, too, would like to be paying only the standard Medicare Part B premium. But what I like more—and truly appreciate—is being in such an enviable position that I have to pay a lot more for Medicare than the vast majority of my fellow seniors.

If you’re one of those Americans who supports the fair share rhetoric directed at the super-wealthy, keep in mind this principle should apply to everyone. Most out-of-pocket health care costs, and even most health care insurance premiums, are highly regressive. They don’t care how much you earn. A young family with modest income can have a $5,000 deductible and pay $500 a month in premiums, just like the wealthy family two towns over. Seniors have good health care coverage and, overall, relatively modest costs. Why not make Medicare premiums a bit progressive?

Call me naive, but I don’t think it’s right for well-off older Americans to employ financial strategies that avoid or minimize IRMAA premium surcharges—things like doing Roth conversions in their 50s and early 60s, so their modified adjusted gross income later looks modest for IRMAA purposes.

Among some Facebook groups I follow, people are obsessed with IRMAA and view it as unfair—something to avoid as a part of retirement planning. My contention: We may not like those extra Medicare premiums taking a chunk out of our Social Security check—but they strike me as fair.