this is what they don’t want their taxes paying for. This is what Project 2025 and the Trump administration say need to be cut, and what individual responsibility and empowerment should take care of.
These are some of the programs many Americans say are used by lazy loafers who don’t want to work.
And, no, nobody pays for their own Social Security and Medicare benefits – Both are a collective risk using an insurance concept.
Americas social safety net
Social Security – Retirement, disability, and survivor benefits – 74 million beneficiaries
Medicare – Health insurance for seniors and certain disabled people – 69 million
Medicaid – Health coverage for low-income individuals – 79 million
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) – Food assistance – 42 million
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) – Cash assistance for eligible families – 1 million
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) – Income support for elderly or disabled people with limited income – 7.4 million
Unemployment Insurance -.Temporary income after job loss – 1-3 million typically
Children Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Health insurance for children – 7.2 million
Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program – Rental assistance – 2.3 million households
National School Lunch Program – Free or reduced-price school meals – 30 million
Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) – Nutrition support for mothers and young children – 6.6 million
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) – Tax credit for low- and moderate-income workers – 60 million
Public Housing Program – Affordable government-supported housing – 1.7 million
Pell Grant – College grants for eligible students – 6.7 million
Head Start – Early childhood education – 1 million
Child Tax Credit (CTC) – 48 million
Safety net programs (excluding Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid): account for about 11% of the federal budget.
The two tax credits are about 2.8% of the federal budget.
I suspect that not many of us would like to change our lifestyle so we can avoid work and instead live the life of most of the Americans using these programs. Even now millions of seniors claim Social Security and Medicare are insufficient and want more.
Those Americans who say they “ worked their entire life, paid their own way, paid their fair share, their dues” probably did not start in poverty or experience some significant hardships, and may have received a good education and had the ability and encouragement to use it.
Oh yeah, what about fraud? Not a significant percentage of payments and not to be confused with payment errors.
By dollar amount, provider and organizational fraud often accounts for much larger financial losses than individual beneficiary fraud, particularly in healthcare programs like Medicaid and Medicare, where false billing schemes can involve millions of dollars.
For programs such as SNAP (food assistance), fraud by recipients does occur, but studies and government oversight generally find that:
- Most recipients comply with program rules.
- Payment errors (which include both agency and recipient mistakes) are more common than intentional fraud.
- Intentional trafficking of SNAP benefits represents only a small fraction of total benefits issued.
Some abuse will be part of any program, like Americans who underreport income or claim false deductions on income tax. That is not an excuse for cutting programs.
To combat fraud, errors and abuse at any level you would think additional oversight and auditing would be desirable. That’s not Trump’s view, he rather harm program participants.
Just days into his second term, on the night of January 24-25, 2025, President Trump fired at least 17 presidentially appointed inspectors general (IGs) across major federal agencies
The firings didn’t stop there. On October 15, 2025, Trump fired the inspector general for the Export-Import Bank, and Public Citizen noted at least four more IGs were fired after the initial January purge.
Between the firings, resignations, and vacancies carried over from the Biden administration, over 75% of presidentially appointed inspector general positions have ended up vacant.
How’s that for a rational strategy not politically or ideologically driven ❓
But there is a very real risk and that is the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
Wall Street Journal- abolish the senate
QUINNSCOMMENTARY 